2019
DOI: 10.15575/jp.v3i2.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Student Tahfidz Program Implementation Faculty of Social and Political Science Through the Countenance Evaluation Model Approach

Abstract: All programs in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences of UIN SGD Bandung are expected to produce outputs that have an impact on improving quality in all fields. Therefore, each program is always maintained its quality both in terms of planning, process and evaluation. The Countenance Evaluation Model is a model that raises broader insights in evaluating the implementation of a program, including the Student Tahfidz Institute. The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of the Tahfidz P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there are many evaluation models that are generally used to determine to what extent a program can be conducted and what steps to be taken in the future. The evaluation model developed by some experts is (1) Goal-Oriented Evaluation Model (Nawai & Rahmat, 2019;Ruete & Leynaud, 2015;Takanobu et al, 2020) (2) Formative -Summative Evaluation Model (Hamdi, 2020;Mohammed, 2021), (3) CIPP Evaluation Model (Darma, 2019;Finney, 2020;Stufflebeam, 2002;Warju, 2016), (4) Discrepancy Model (Gardner et al, 2021;Mustafa, 2021;Psycinfo, 2021), (5) Countenance Evaluation Model (Fauziah et al, 2019;Mustafa, 2021;Theresa, 2018;Warju, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there are many evaluation models that are generally used to determine to what extent a program can be conducted and what steps to be taken in the future. The evaluation model developed by some experts is (1) Goal-Oriented Evaluation Model (Nawai & Rahmat, 2019;Ruete & Leynaud, 2015;Takanobu et al, 2020) (2) Formative -Summative Evaluation Model (Hamdi, 2020;Mohammed, 2021), (3) CIPP Evaluation Model (Darma, 2019;Finney, 2020;Stufflebeam, 2002;Warju, 2016), (4) Discrepancy Model (Gardner et al, 2021;Mustafa, 2021;Psycinfo, 2021), (5) Countenance Evaluation Model (Fauziah et al, 2019;Mustafa, 2021;Theresa, 2018;Warju, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption test used in this study is goodness-of-fit (GOF) using the Schoenfeld residual test. After obtaining the Schoenfeld residual with Equation (1) [31,32],…”
Section: Proportional Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness-of-fit test results were obtained with the help of R 4.1.1 software, as shown in Table 8. The following is an example of calculating the goodness-of-fit test for the gender variable (X 1 ) using hypotheses [32,41]. a.…”
Section: Cox Proportional Hazard Assumption Testmentioning
confidence: 99%