2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Tissue Reaction to Fast Endodontic Cement (CER) and Angelus MTA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
109
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
109
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, MTA, which is also called ProRoot MTA, has been used successfully in endodonctics for the past 10 years. [1][2][3] More recently, new products similar to MTA have been introduced into the market including MTA angelus [4][5][6] and MTAbio 7 (Angelus Solucoes Odontologicas, Londrina, Brazil) and Bioaggregate 8 (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, Canada). Bioaggregate is sold exclusively in Canada.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, MTA, which is also called ProRoot MTA, has been used successfully in endodonctics for the past 10 years. [1][2][3] More recently, new products similar to MTA have been introduced into the market including MTA angelus [4][5][6] and MTAbio 7 (Angelus Solucoes Odontologicas, Londrina, Brazil) and Bioaggregate 8 (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, Canada). Bioaggregate is sold exclusively in Canada.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 It is known that CER cement releases calcium and hydroxyl ions, and increases the pH of the medium in a manner similar to that of MTA cement. 13 After 24 hours, the calcium and hydroxyl ions released by CER cement are greater than those released by MTA; however, following this initial period, the values become similar.…”
Section: A B C D E Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the setting time of the tested cements may extend from 24 hours (initial setting time) up to 7 days (final setting time), the rate of calcium and hydroxyl ions released from the cements may vary significantly, thus allowing for an increase in cement cytotoxicity. 16,17 On the other hand, a previous in vivo study 18 reported a favorable histological response promoted by CER and MTA at the 7-day period. However, it is worthwhile stressing that in vitro conditions are not homeostatic, and that there is no tissue elimination of toxic substances, such as that reported for in vivo assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…7,8 MTA'nın birçok avantajına rağmen reolojik özellikleri klinik uygulamasını zorlaştırmakta ve yaygın kullanımını sınırlamaktadır. 9 MTA'nın uygulama esnasında periapikal dokulara taşması düşük derecede reaksiyona neden olsa bile kontrollü bir şekilde kullanımı önerilmektedir. 10 İnternal matriks kullanımıyla MTA'nın periapikal bölgeye taşması engellenir, tamir materyalinin sızıntısı azalmakta ve periodontal dokular korunmuş olmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified