Evaluations and Comparisons of Body Surface Doses during Breast Cancer Treatment by Tomotherapy and LINAC Radiotherapy Devices

Abstract

Effects on skin caused by the dose from linear accelerator (LINAC) opposing portal irradiation and TomoDirect 3-D modeling treatment according to the radiation devices and treatment methods were measured, and a comparative analysis was performed. Two groups of 10 patients each were created and measurements were carried out using an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter. These patients were already receiving radiation treatment in the hospital. Using the SPSS statistical program, the minimum and maximum average standard deviations of the measured skin dose data were obtained. Two types of treatment method were selected as independent variables; the measured points and total average were the dependent variables. An independent sample T-test was used, and it was checked whether there was a significance probability between the two groups. The average of the measured results for the LINAC opposing portal radiation was 117.7 cGy and PDD 65.39% for the inner breast, 144.7 cGy and PDD 80.39% for the outer breast, 143.2 cGy and PDD 79.56% for the upper breast, 151.4 cGy and PDD 84.11% for the lower breast, 149.6 cGy and PDD 83.11% for the axilla, and 141.32 cGy and PDD 78.51% for the total average. In contrast, for TomoDirect 3-D conformal radiotherapy, the corresponding measurement values were 137.6 cGy and PDD 76.44%, 152.3 cGy and PDD 84.61%, 148.6 cGy and PDD 82.56%, 159.7 cGy and PDD 88.72%, and 148.6 cGy PDD 82.56%, respectively, and the total average was 149.36 cGy and PDD 82.98%. To determine if the difference between the total averages was statistically significant, the independent sample T-test of the SPSS statistical program was used, which indicated that the P-value was P=0.024, which was 0.05 lower than the significance level. Thus, it can be understood that the null hypothesis can be dismissed, and that there was a difference in the averages. In conclusion, even though the treatment dose was similar, there could be a difference in the dose entering the body surface from the radiation treatment plan; however, depending on the properties of the treatment devices, there is a difference in the dose affecting the body surface. Thus, the absorbed dose entering the body surface can be high. During breast cancer radiotherapy, radiation dermatitis occurs in almost all patients. Most patients have a difficult time while undergoing treatment, and therefore, when choosing a radiotherapy treatment method, minimizing radiation dermatitis is an important consideration. classification of side-effect levels, of a total of 284 patients, 207 patients had 0th and 1st stage minor radiation dermatitis, and 77 patients had 2nd or greater stage serious radiation dermatitis. Keywords9) The main symptom of radiation dermatitis is red spots, and oily or dry skin accompanied by severe itching and pain in a portion of the patients. 10,11)The reason why each patient has different degrees of symptoms, from the patient perspective, is the cancer size or skin type and the degree of skin moisture; when looking at it from the treatment...

Development and evaluation of a lead oxide flexible skin dosimeter with a silicon passive layer

“…Clinical trials require the dose irradiated on the skin to be assessed, and dosimeters such as film, optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry (OSLD), thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD), glass dosimeter, and so forth are being used [3][4][5][6]. However, these skin dosimeters lack flexibility, making it difficult to measure the dose on the curved surface of the human body [7][8][9]. For this reason, a digital dosimeter is required in clinical practice, and various types of detectors are being studied.…”

Evaluation of monoxide film-based dosimeters for surface dose detection in electron therapy

“…However, none of these devices can obtain the dose distribution on the body surface because they measure the point dose with the integrated dosimeter of the analog detection method. Additionally, as the attachment part on a patient’s body, which is naturally curved, is checked visually, the positional accuracy can be unreliable [ 6 ]. For example, the average error rate of a digital MOSFET dosimeter was reported to be 22.8% [ 7 ].…”

Development and evaluation of a monoxide-based flexible skin dosimeter for radiotherapy at photon energies

“…Therefore, in clinical patient treatment, dosimeters are used to verify the skin dose, such as lm, glass dosimeter (GD), optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD), and thermo luminescent dosimeter (TLD). Nevertheless, with these skin dosimeters, accurate dose measurements are challenging due to the curvature of the human body surface [7][8][9] . Thus, clinical patient treatments require digital dosimeters relying on exible materials with no function loss when bent, depending on the human curve.…”