2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1566-1369(02)80006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the Charpy-V test from a quality control test to a materials evaluation tool for structural integrity assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Master Curve part (scatter, size and temperature dependence of fracture toughness) has been standardized in ASTM E1921‐2001. The correlation between T 28 J and the Master Curve transition temperature T 0 has also been well verified for both low and extra high strength steels 10,11 . The assumption requiring some discussion is the justification for using fixed differences between T 68 J , T 41 J and T 28 J .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Master Curve part (scatter, size and temperature dependence of fracture toughness) has been standardized in ASTM E1921‐2001. The correlation between T 28 J and the Master Curve transition temperature T 0 has also been well verified for both low and extra high strength steels 10,11 . The assumption requiring some discussion is the justification for using fixed differences between T 68 J , T 41 J and T 28 J .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The correlation between T 28 J and the Master Curve transition temperature T 0 has also been well verified for both low and extra high strength steels. 10,11 The assumption requiring some discussion is the justification for using fixed differences between T 68 J , T 41 J and T 28 J . There is no way of predicting a steels upper shelf energy based on information regarding strength level or quality class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wallin et al have suggested [19] that when Charpy energy (C V ) normalized by yield stress (according to Wallin et al [19], ultimate tensile stress-UTS-would be still better) at the corresponding test temperature is plotted against the LE, a master curve type plot for all the steels is obtained. It is noted that for many of the steels YS-temperature data over the Charpy transition region are easily available whereas UTS data are not so readily available.…”
Section: Ys Normalized C V -Le Datamentioning
confidence: 99%