Evolving Global Manufacturing Strategies: Projections into the 1990s

Abstract

Large manufacturers in Western Europe, North America and Japan show similarities and differences in their manufacturing strategies. A survey of nearly 1,500 large manufacturers in these areas shows that they all place major emphasis on new products, quality and the use of computer power in manufacturing. The differences in the pattern of strategic directions and priorities for manufacturers in each area are observed, and the implementation of manufacturing strategies discussed. Vulnerable elements in the pattern of dominant manufacturing strategies are observed. In the 1990s Japanese manufacturing management is likely to be focused on balancing the need for change with the need to preserve existing capabilities and strengths. The Americans will focus on fundamental approaches to quality control and sophisticated computer‐based information systems. European manufacturers will focus on the need for structural changes in the organisation, workforce and technology. All regions will be faced with a shortage of people with the various skills required to implement new technologies.

Decision hierarchy, competitive priorities and indicators in large-scale ‘herbaceous biomass to energy’ supply chains

“…one can be improved only by sacrificing others. The sand-cone model of Ferdow et al [19] stated that, assuming there is a particular order, competitive priorities can support and reinforce one another. Hill [20] differentiated two groups of competitive priorities: the qualifying criteria are the minimum conditions that are necessary to enter a market, whereas order-winning criteria explain why consumers choose a given product.…”

How hotels compete on the basis of competitive priorities and their relationship with infrastructural and structural decisions

“…Diaz- , Avella (1999) Organizational structure Boyer and McDermott (1999), Avella (1999), Ferdows et al (1986) Human resources management Ward et al (2007), Kim and Arnold (1996) T. F. Espino-Rodríguez (Lawrence and Hottenstein 1995;Flynn et al 1990). Cronbach's alpha scores for the scales that measure the operations decisions and competitive priorities ranged from a low of 0.60 to a high of 0.87, indicating that they have a sufficiently high degree of inter-item reliability (Nunnally 1978) (see Table 4).…”

Manufacturing Strategy and Competitive Advantage: A Mediating role of Organizational Culture (A Case Study of Small Industry Batik Trusmi Indonesia)

“…Manufacturing task is defined as manufacturing capabilities used to achieve and maintain competitive position the company has set as a target. Skinner (1969); Wheelwright and Hayes (1985); Ferdows et al (1990) as well as Ward and Duray (2000) emphasize on low production cost, product quality and performance, flexibility, product delivery and innovation level as five critical capabilities in manufacturing field.…”