2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on an open sorption thermal storage system for space heating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several combinations of salt hydrates and matrices for thermal energy storage exist. One of the salts that have been extensively evaluated in the scientific literature is MgSO 4 •7H 2 O, whose theoretical energy storage density is 2.8 GJ/m 3 [11] and can be used under both ambient pressure and sub-atmospheric pressure [12], thus being suitable for the application in open cycles or closed cycles. The salt can be efficiently regenerated also at temperatures < 150 • C, compatible with the integration in low-grade heat recovery systems or solar systems in buildings [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several combinations of salt hydrates and matrices for thermal energy storage exist. One of the salts that have been extensively evaluated in the scientific literature is MgSO 4 •7H 2 O, whose theoretical energy storage density is 2.8 GJ/m 3 [11] and can be used under both ambient pressure and sub-atmospheric pressure [12], thus being suitable for the application in open cycles or closed cycles. The salt can be efficiently regenerated also at temperatures < 150 • C, compatible with the integration in low-grade heat recovery systems or solar systems in buildings [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy density of the fixed bed was also comparable to experiments performed by Zhang et al [59] that obtained 115 -137 kWh/m 3 for flow rates of 17 -50 m 3 /h [59]. In the design of an adsorption TES for a home, the storage capacity would determine the minimum amount of material required per charge/discharge cycle for a seasonal storage system based on the annual demand of the heating load, whereas the column energy density would dictate the volume of the adsorber required for meeting the demand on a shorter time-scale (e.g., hourly), as the adsorber is only a fraction of the whole system including the material storage.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…This result was expected as the adsorption equilibrium of the zeolite 13X-water vapour pair is independent of air flow rate[58]. The amount of water uptake observed indicates that the zeolite samples reached an average adsorption capacity (q eq ) of 0.19 -0.22 g H2O /g 13X which is typical of the adsorption isotherm for zeolite 13X and identical to the study conducted by Zhang et al, in which 0.18 -0.20 g H2O /g 13X of loading was measured by their experimental setup[59]. Based on an enthalpy of adsorption of 4.2 kJ/g H2O (1,800 BTU/lb H2O ) provided by the manufacturer in Appendix B, 20.2 to 22.7 kJ of heat per 25 g sample would be expected from this amount of loading.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Open ATES cycles have been studied extensively because of their advantages such as the absence of hardware for the energy input and the rejection of the working fluids. Liu [60]. A temperature lift above 10 °C was able to achieve more than 7 h, with an energy density value of 191 kWh/m 3 , while the system efficiency was recorded to be 84.5-96.9%.…”
Section: Investigation Of Open Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 95%