2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0049941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on optimal plasma generation in inductively coupled plasma

Abstract: Total energy loss per ion–electron pair lost (εT) is investigated to optimize the plasma generation at various RF powers and gas pressures in an argon inductively coupled plasma (ICP). The ion densities and electron temperatures are measured to obtain εT at the plasma–sheath edge. At a fixed RF power, the obtained εT has a minimum at a certain electron temperature, and at this condition, an optimal plasma generation is achieved according to a global model. Since the electron temperature is a function of the ga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the electron distribution of the calculated ε T and measured ε T is the same as the Maxwellian distribution. When the gas pressure is 1.33 Pa (10 mTorr) at 300 W, the measured ε T is slightly smaller than the calculated ε T because the population of the high-energy electron in the bi-Maxwellian distribution is larger than that in the Maxwellian distribution [78,79]. When compared to the measured ε T in the N 2 plasma, the measured ε T in the Ar plasma is significantly lower (see figure 6(b)) and did not considerably increase with gas pressure.…”
Section: Argon Dischargementioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is because the electron distribution of the calculated ε T and measured ε T is the same as the Maxwellian distribution. When the gas pressure is 1.33 Pa (10 mTorr) at 300 W, the measured ε T is slightly smaller than the calculated ε T because the population of the high-energy electron in the bi-Maxwellian distribution is larger than that in the Maxwellian distribution [78,79]. When compared to the measured ε T in the N 2 plasma, the measured ε T in the Ar plasma is significantly lower (see figure 6(b)) and did not considerably increase with gas pressure.…”
Section: Argon Dischargementioning
confidence: 69%