2016 IEEE 17th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/spawc.2016.7536825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on channel reciprocity in wireless key generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When the system works at 2.4 GHz, a half-wavelength is about 6 cm, which is quite short. These principles have been theoretically modeled and analyzed in [43], [44] and experimentally validated in [38], [39].…”
Section: Physical Layer Key Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the system works at 2.4 GHz, a half-wavelength is about 6 cm, which is quite short. These principles have been theoretically modeled and analyzed in [43], [44] and experimentally validated in [38], [39].…”
Section: Physical Layer Key Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that channel reciprocity holds even in multipath fading channels with slow/fast fading [27,28]. In practice, however, channel reciprocity may not always be true, since the channel measurement times are not identical at each node, and the noise level depends on the transceiver circuit.…”
Section: Next Channel Number Generation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, channel reciprocity may not always be true, since the channel measurement times are not identical at each node, and the noise level depends on the transceiver circuit. Indeed, there are many approaches to ensure channel reciprocity in wireless systems, such as interpolation and filtering [28]. The interpolation methods emulate the identical channel measurement times at the nodes [29,30] and the filtering methods eliminate the high frequency components in noise [31,32].…”
Section: Next Channel Number Generation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying idea of it lies in the use of channel reciprocity and the uncertainty of multipath characteristics to encrypt the transmitted information in order to solve the problem of symmetric secret key distribution [3,4]. Besides, the spatial variation prevents eavesdroppers from observing the same randomness as legitimate users, for a sufficiently large distance between them.Although the uplink and downlink channels are reciprocal, measurements of radio channels are not the same, due to the differences originating from additive noise, transceiver hardware, and time delay in time division duplex (TDD) systems [5]. However, the objective of PKG is to generate a pair of strict identical symmetric keys.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%