2012
DOI: 10.1177/1527002511433469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Relationship Between Intercollegiate Athletic Expenditures and Team On-Field Success Among NCAA Division I Institutions

Abstract: In recent years, there has been increased research exploring the relationship between college/university intercollegiate athletic expenditures and team on-field success. Scope and methodological limitations of this previous research, however, suggest the need for further empirical research in this area. This study uses regression analyses with time and institutional fixed effects and several control variables to investigate the relationship between college/university athletic department expenditures and overal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on the Football Championship Subdivision is limited and only a scant amount of literature has touched on marketing (Cooper, 2010;Havard et al, 2012), departmental change (Peachey & Bruening, 2011;Peachey, Bruening, & Barton, 2011), APR scores (Chandler, 2014;Johnson et al, 2015), winning percentages (Jones, 2013), attendance (Falls & Natke, 2015), and reclassification (Chandler, 2014;Dwyer et al, 2010;Upright, 2009). Research on Cuban studentathletes is also limited and scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on the Football Championship Subdivision is limited and only a scant amount of literature has touched on marketing (Cooper, 2010;Havard et al, 2012), departmental change (Peachey & Bruening, 2011;Peachey, Bruening, & Barton, 2011), APR scores (Chandler, 2014;Johnson et al, 2015), winning percentages (Jones, 2013), attendance (Falls & Natke, 2015), and reclassification (Chandler, 2014;Dwyer et al, 2010;Upright, 2009). Research on Cuban studentathletes is also limited and scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No studies could be found that specifically addressed the experiences of FCS athletes. FCS literature included studies on electronic marketing (Cooper, 2010;Havard, Eddy, Reams, Stewart & Admad, 2012), athletic department change (Peachey & Bruening, 2012;Peachey, Bruening & Burton, 2011), Academic Progress Rate (APR) scores (Chandler, 2014;Johnson, Pierce, Tracy, & Ridley, 2015), winning success (Jones, 2013), attendance (Falls & Natke, 2015) and NCAA reclassification (Chandler, 2014;Dwyer, Eddy, Havard, & Braa, 2010;Upright, 2009). …”
Section: Fcs Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also increased the likelihood of finishing the season in the Top 25 by 5%. Lawrence et al 53 and Jones 54 examined National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics (NACDA) Director's Cup scores and how they were impacted by athletic expenditures. These two studies broadened the success definition, and included total expenditures and other institutional variables.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specially, their data concluded an extra million dollars spend on operating expenditure for football is estimated to increase the team's winning by 1.8 percentage points and the chances of ending the season in the top 25 in the AP poll by 5%. A more recent study found that institutional athletics expenditures were strongly correlated with FBS institutions' on-field performance, but not among non-FBS institutions at the Division I level (Jones, 2012). Meanwhile, Lawrence and colleagues (2012) determined that investing heavily in women's sports would most likely result in greater success for the overall department in terms Director Cup points.…”
Section: Intercollegiate Sport Spending and Successmentioning
confidence: 99%