2012
DOI: 10.1108/08876041211199724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fan identification, Schadenfreude toward hated rivals, and the mediating effects of Importance of Winning Index (IWIN)

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore potential negative outcomes of high fan identification as well as to identify the causal mechanism or mediator by which high identification may result in such negative responses.Design/methodology/approachA scale development process was used to develop a new mediating construct for the fan identification literature, the Importance of Winning Index (IWIN). Structural equations modeling was used to analyze the surveys.FindingsThe IWIN construct represents a new and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, Kilduff et al (2010) suggest that rivalry is driven more by long-term than short-term competition. Based on Social Identity Theory (Tajfel, 1974), research on rivalry has focused on the influence the phenomenon has on individual sport fans and fan groups (Dalakas & Melancon, 2012;Dalakas, Melancon, & Sreboth, 2015;Havard, 2014Havard, , 2016Havard, Eddy, & Ryan, 2016;Havard & Reams, 2016;Havard, Shapiro, & Ridinger, 2016). Because competitive history is so important to the formation and existence of rivalry, the recent bevy of schools that changed athletic conferences would fundamentally alter teams seen as rivals to fan groups.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Kilduff et al (2010) suggest that rivalry is driven more by long-term than short-term competition. Based on Social Identity Theory (Tajfel, 1974), research on rivalry has focused on the influence the phenomenon has on individual sport fans and fan groups (Dalakas & Melancon, 2012;Dalakas, Melancon, & Sreboth, 2015;Havard, 2014Havard, , 2016Havard, Eddy, & Ryan, 2016;Havard & Reams, 2016;Havard, Shapiro, & Ridinger, 2016). Because competitive history is so important to the formation and existence of rivalry, the recent bevy of schools that changed athletic conferences would fundamentally alter teams seen as rivals to fan groups.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, there was not found any relationship between fan aggressions and rivalry [25]. The so-called Schadenfreude -the German word for a feeling by a person who experience pleasure by the failure of another person/group/object-was identified by highly identified fans toward a hatred rival [13].…”
Section: Foundations Of Rivalrymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nonetheless, researchers have not been treating rivalry as a specific phenomenon in the context of competition. The term rival was more a synonym for descriptions as "disliked competitor" [13].…”
Section: Foundations Of Rivalrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is possible for fans to have a strong liking and attachment to their own team without necessarily disparaging or denigrating other teams. In fact, Dalakas and Melancon (2012) found that high fan identification was connected to higher schadenfreude toward opponents through the mediating variable associated with importance of winning. In other words, not all highly identified fans took pleasure at their opponents' misfortunes.…”
Section: Openness To Out-group and Fan Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Besides behavior exhibiting aggression, high fan identification has been associated with other questionable attitudes and behaviors that could be linked to aggression. For example, Dalakas and Melancon (2012) found a relationship between fan identification and schadenfreude (joy at misfortune) toward rivals, while Wann and his colleagues found that team identification influenced fans' willingness to consider illegally assisting their team (Wann, Hunter, Ryan, & Wright, 2001).…”
Section: Team Attachment: Identification and Fan Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 94%