2009
DOI: 10.1021/nl9001876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fano Resonances in Individual Coherent Plasmonic Nanocavities

Abstract: We observe the appearance of Fano resonances in the optical response of plasmonic nanocavities due to the coherent coupling between their superradiant and subradiant plasmon modes. Two reduced-symmetry nanostructures probed via confocal spectroscopy, a dolmen-style slab arrangement and a ring/disk dimer, clearly exhibit the strong polarization and geometry dependence expected for this behavior at the individual nanostructure level, confirmed by full-field electrodynamic analysis of each structure. In each case… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
604
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 670 publications
(613 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
604
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One should note, however, that the FR is not efficiently excited for very small r c values. In this case, electromagnetic coupling is too weak compared to absorption losses and the resonance vanishes, i.e., the value of b increases, in analogy to the behaviour reported for dolmen plasmonic structures 55,56 .…”
Section: Composition and Size Effectssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…One should note, however, that the FR is not efficiently excited for very small r c values. In this case, electromagnetic coupling is too weak compared to absorption losses and the resonance vanishes, i.e., the value of b increases, in analogy to the behaviour reported for dolmen plasmonic structures 55,56 .…”
Section: Composition and Size Effectssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…1 Subwavelength structures on resonance can have scattering cross sections much larger than their geometrical sizes, 2,3 and the presence of multiple resonances leads to even more possibilities through mode hybridization 4 and interference effects. [5][6][7][8][9] A particularly interesting phenomenon is the suppressed scattering in nanostructures with multiple plasmonic resonances, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] plasmonic and excitonic resonances, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or dielectric resonances, 31,32 referred to collectively as a "scattering dark state." A wealth of models has been employed to describe this suppressed scattering, ranging from perturbative models, 12 generalization of the Fano formula, [13][14][15] and electrostatic approximation, 22,23 to coupled-mechanical-oscillator models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we have witnessed considerable efforts for the development of plasmonics and photonics-based nanosensors for biochemical and genetic analysis, especially for screening and rapid detection of cancer markers (Anker et al 2008;Cao et al 2013;Chao and Guo 2003;de la Rica and Stevens 2012;Fan et al 2010;Hao et al 2008;Luk'yanchuk et al 2010;Miroshnichenko et al 2010;Peng et al 2013;Rodriguez-Lorenzo et al 2012;Truong et al 2011;Verellen et al 2009;Wen et al 2013;Xu et al 2011;Zhang et al 2013). These systems provide a range of benefits such as shorter analysis time, lower consumption of sample, chemical reagent and energy, lower cost, and portability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%