2009 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cicc.2009.5280830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast lock scheme for phase-locked loops

Abstract: This paper describes a fast lock scheme for phaselocked loops (PLLs). The proposed scheme utilizes mostly digital logic and control to achieve significant reduction in PLL lock acquisition time, which enables dynamic power cycling for various sub-systems on SOC designs. Multiple Self-Bias PLLs having fast lock schemes were designed to operate at VCO frequencies from 1.6GHz to 5GHz, and fabricated using 65nm CMOS process. Silicon measurements indicate up to 75% reduction in worst-case PLL lock times over the de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PLL lock time takes typically tens of microseconds for a modern digital PLL [8]. Modern processors such as the Nehalem architecture of Intel typically have several micro-seconds lock time [9,1]. A StrongARM 1100 processor measurement result shows that the PLL lock time is insensitive to the difference between the current and target frequencies [10].…”
Section: Clock Frequency Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLL lock time takes typically tens of microseconds for a modern digital PLL [8]. Modern processors such as the Nehalem architecture of Intel typically have several micro-seconds lock time [9,1]. A StrongARM 1100 processor measurement result shows that the PLL lock time is insensitive to the difference between the current and target frequencies [10].…”
Section: Clock Frequency Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designs range from conventional PFDs, which measure negative and positive phase offsets on separate binary output signals by producing pulses whose width is the negative/positive phase offset, to more advanced setups [17]. Phase differences are then either forwarded to charge pumps (analog PLLs) [18] or converted to digital counter offsets (digital PLLs). For the latter, an unstable phase difference poses a risk for increased power consumption and likelihood of metastable upsets; see [16], where a filter on phase difference signals for a low-power digital PLL is proposed.…”
Section: Related Work and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creative PLL circuit could improve the stability of loop bandwidth by self-compensation, against the variation of manufacturing process parameters, while saving the cost of band gap reference. Based on the self-biased PLL proposed by Reference [1], Patent [2] and Reference [3] have carried on some improvements or adjustments. But the self-biased PLLs mentioned above also suffer from some drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%