2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4504-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of a 2nd generation MR-compatible manipulator for transrectal prostate biopsy guidance

Abstract: ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility of a 2nd generation MR-compatible, remote-controlled manipulator (RCM) as an aid to perform MR-guided transrectal prostate biopsy in males with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa).MethodsThis prospective phase I study was approved by the local ethical committee and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Twenty patients with ≥1 cancer suspicious region (CSR) with a PI-RADS score of ≥3 detected on the diagnostic multi-parametric MRI and no prior prostate treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the median procedure times of transrectal in-bore MR-guided prostate biopsy reported in the literature (30-68 min) [ 13 ], this presents a considerable time improvement. Another study described initial results using a robotic manipulator and reported biopsy of one CSR per patient in a median of 37 min (range: 23-61) [ 23 ]. Another study used a needle-guide tracking sequence enabling biopsy of a median of two CSRs (range: 1-4) per patient in a median of 32 min (range: 14-48), without diagnostic scans at the beginning of the biopsy procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the median procedure times of transrectal in-bore MR-guided prostate biopsy reported in the literature (30-68 min) [ 13 ], this presents a considerable time improvement. Another study described initial results using a robotic manipulator and reported biopsy of one CSR per patient in a median of 37 min (range: 23-61) [ 23 ]. Another study used a needle-guide tracking sequence enabling biopsy of a median of two CSRs (range: 1-4) per patient in a median of 32 min (range: 14-48), without diagnostic scans at the beginning of the biopsy procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These motors have good specifications, but are also relative and complex to build. Bomers et al developed a five DOF robot for prostate biopsy guidance [8], driven by pneumatic screw-motion stepper motors which, while useful in this application, are difficult to use in smaller scale robotics. Franco et al developed a four DOF robot for liver biopsy, driven by relatively large pneumatic cylinders with a time-delay control scheme [6], which is difficult to control precisely due to the complex pneumatic model.…”
Section: B State-of-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI is ideally suited for percutaneous needle interventions where image‐guidance is required to steer a needle through the skin to a target organ 5 . Clinical applications of percutaneous MR‐guided interventions range from analgesic injections for pain palliation, 6,7 biopsy procedures in prostate, 8‐10 to laser 11 and cryoablational thermal treatments 12 for local tissue necrosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%