2012
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback About More Accurate Versus Less Accurate Trials

Abstract: One purpose of the present study was to examine whether self-confidence or anxiety would be differentially affected byfeedback from more accurate rather than less accurate trials. The second purpose was to determine whether arousal variations (activation) would predict performance. On day 1, participants performed a golf putting task under one of two conditions: one group received feedback on the most accurate trials, whereas another group received feedback on the least accurate trials. On day 2, participants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For top performance accomplishment in sports, the brain dynamics needs to be taken into account because it determines both motor control and crucial psychological factors, such as intrinsic motivation (Pedersen, 2002 ), selective attention (Arjona et al, 2014 ; Abdollahipour et al, 2015 ), goal setting (West and Thorn, 2001 ), working memory (Dipoppa and Gutkin, 2013 ), decision making (Renfree et al, 2014 ), positive self-concept (Badami et al, 2012 ), and self-control (Ali et al, 2012 ; Chiviacowsky et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For top performance accomplishment in sports, the brain dynamics needs to be taken into account because it determines both motor control and crucial psychological factors, such as intrinsic motivation (Pedersen, 2002 ), selective attention (Arjona et al, 2014 ; Abdollahipour et al, 2015 ), goal setting (West and Thorn, 2001 ), working memory (Dipoppa and Gutkin, 2013 ), decision making (Renfree et al, 2014 ), positive self-concept (Badami et al, 2012 ), and self-control (Ali et al, 2012 ; Chiviacowsky et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was hypothesized that self-efficacy would increase throughout training because prior work has shown that simulator training can increase resident comfort with CVC procedures. 11 However, it was also hypothesized that residents in the robotic group would have larger improvements on CVC self-efficacy because prior research has shown that providing feedback increases self-efficacy 22,23 and help users cognitively engage during the learning process. 29 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was hypothesized that self-ratings of performance would increase in both groups throughout training because prior studies have indicated that self-perception of motor skills improve with training. 22,23 In addition, research has shown that competency-based simulation training in US-guided CVC insertion was more effective than relying solely on the traditional apprenticeship model in improving in-hospital performance and resident skills. 30 However, manikin systems only provide very basic feedback on performance (blue liquid is aspirated if the catheter hits a vein), and there is no objective performance criterion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that WTA beliefs lead individuals to seek out feedback from other people about how to improve their future performance (Walker and Smither, 1999), which can enhance performance on various lab-based tasks (Badami et al, 2012). In one of the few longitudinal studies in this area, managers who initially received the poorest feedback from their coworkers, and who used this feedback to seek out constructive comments from their peers, demonstrated the greatest performance gains over a 5-year period as compared to managers who did not seek out peer feedback (Walker and Smither, 1999).…”
Section: Skill Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%