2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flaming on YouTube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
119
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Flaming has been found to be commonplace on YouTube (Moor, Heuvelman and Verleur 2010). Whilst in the majority of cases actions perceived as "flaming" seem to be intended to express disagreement or an opinion, in some cases the actions were made to intentionally offend others.…”
Section: Bullying Amongst Lgbt Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flaming has been found to be commonplace on YouTube (Moor, Heuvelman and Verleur 2010). Whilst in the majority of cases actions perceived as "flaming" seem to be intended to express disagreement or an opinion, in some cases the actions were made to intentionally offend others.…”
Section: Bullying Amongst Lgbt Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Também merece investigação o exame de contextos específi cos em que o fenômeno sugere comportamento normativo, ou seja, em que o fl aming é usado como forma de marcar identidade, ou pertencimento a grupo (Moor et al 2010). Para tanto, será necessário coligir corpora distintos, com características específi cas, como jogos virtuais, comentários no YouTube (Lehti et al 2016), dentre outros.…”
Section: Conclusãounclassified
“…First, interpersonal swearing refers to a designative use of taboo-words, targeting specific individuals who involve in the social interactions. Unless communicators share mutual consent that swearing be an acceptable norm for their interactions [19,20], swearing can promote interpersonal attacks or inflammatory behaviors [13]. In particular, Alonzo and Aiken [20] point out profanity as a prominent characteristic of Internet flaming and trolling.…”
Section: Interpersonal Swearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While swearing as an emotional speech act may sometimes induce the feeling of liberation, the impact of swearing on political discursive culture online can be agonistic for two reasons. First, online swearing often occurs without contemplation whether or not other users would perceive it as acceptable [10,13]. Second, it is unclear whether the effect of swearing on mediated discursive culture is transitory or more indelible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%