2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-009-9488-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flocculation of microalgae using cationic starch

Abstract: Due to their small size and low concentration in the culture medium, cost-efficient harvesting of microalgae is a major challenge. We evaluated the potential of cationic starch as a flocculant for harvesting microalgae using jar test experiments. Cationic starch was an efficient flocculant for freshwater (Parachlorella, Scenedesmus) but not for marine microalgae (Phaeodactylum, Nannochloropsis). At high cationic starch doses, dispersion restabilization was observed. The required cationic starch dose to induce … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
135
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
135
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, bioflocculants include biopolymers like chitosan, which comes from the deactylation of chitin from crab and shrimp shells (Farid et al, 2013;Şirin et al, 2013) and poly (γ-glutamic acid), an extracellular product from Bacillus subtilis (Zheng et al, 2012). Modern techniques involve creating new materials like nanoparticles (Farid et al, 2013), magnetic particles (Hu et al, 2013;Prochazkova et al, 2013), cationic polymers (Roselet et al, 2016;Vandamme et al, 2010), polymer composites (Hena et al, 2016), and even combinations of these materials (Hu et al, 2014). Table 3 provides a summary of the different flocculants used for harvesting Nannochloropsis.…”
Section: Harvesting Of Nannochloropsis Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, bioflocculants include biopolymers like chitosan, which comes from the deactylation of chitin from crab and shrimp shells (Farid et al, 2013;Şirin et al, 2013) and poly (γ-glutamic acid), an extracellular product from Bacillus subtilis (Zheng et al, 2012). Modern techniques involve creating new materials like nanoparticles (Farid et al, 2013), magnetic particles (Hu et al, 2013;Prochazkova et al, 2013), cationic polymers (Roselet et al, 2016;Vandamme et al, 2010), polymer composites (Hena et al, 2016), and even combinations of these materials (Hu et al, 2014). Table 3 provides a summary of the different flocculants used for harvesting Nannochloropsis.…”
Section: Harvesting Of Nannochloropsis Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the addition of coagulant dosage reduce the zeta potential of the microalgae colloidal and increased the biomass recovery percentage. On the other hand, the usage of non-toxic organic polymer, such as polyacrylamide copolymers, chitosan, and cationic starch have been intensively investigated for large-scale applications [18,19]. Unfortunately, they are not economical for microalgae due to its higher price.…”
Section: Correlation Of Zeta Potential Values and Flocculation Performentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the referred inorganic multivalent metal salts are toxic and expensive when commercial-scale culture of microalgae. The non-toxic organic polymer, such as polyacrylamide copolymers, chitosan, and cationic starch (Oh et al, 2001;Vandamme et al, 2010), have been intensively investigated for large-scale applications, but they are not economical for microalgae due to its higher price. The flocculant residuals in both algal biomass and harvested water are not only negative for later processing but also disadvantages for culture medium recycling.…”
Section: Biomass Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%