2006
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4933-3-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-cytometric assessment of cellular poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity in peripheral blood lymphocytes

Abstract: Background: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a posttranslational modification of nuclear proteins catalysed by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), using NAD + as a substrate. Activation of PARP-1 is in immediate response to DNA damage generated by endogenous and exogenous damaging agents. It has been implicated in several crucial cellular processes including DNA repair and maintenance of genomic stability, which are both intimately linked with the ageing process. The measurement of cellular poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The range in baseline PAR levels measured between all healthy volunteer samples was 39-fold and in patients with cancer was 32-fold, demonstrating a broad heterogeneity inherent in the population. Inter-individual variation in poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity in healthy volunteer PBMCs has been reported previously [19]. While we do not know the reason for the baseline fluctuation in PAR levels measured in healthy volunteers and patients, we are currently conducting flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy analyses to isolate and identify sensitive subpopulations of PBMCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The range in baseline PAR levels measured between all healthy volunteer samples was 39-fold and in patients with cancer was 32-fold, demonstrating a broad heterogeneity inherent in the population. Inter-individual variation in poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation capacity in healthy volunteer PBMCs has been reported previously [19]. While we do not know the reason for the baseline fluctuation in PAR levels measured in healthy volunteers and patients, we are currently conducting flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy analyses to isolate and identify sensitive subpopulations of PBMCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Initially, U-2 OS cells (seeded in a 6-well-plate with 5 × 10 5 cells/well overnight) were treated with 0.1% DMSO (control), 5 µM or 10 µM of regorafenib for 48 h. Cells were harvested, centrifuged and then resuspended in 300 µL of 1 µL substrate solution fluorescein isothiocyanate-Asp(OCH3)-Glu(OCH3)-Val-Asp(OCH3)-fluoromethyl ketone (caspase-3 FITC-DEVD-FMK) or sulforhodamine-Ile-Glu-Thr-Asp-fluoromethyl ketone (caspase-8 Red-IETDFMK) and were incubated at 37 °C under a humidified 5% CO 2 atmosphere for 60 min. Cells were assayed by caspase-3 and caspase-8 stains as described previously [14,16,17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive control of the PAR signal was obtained by incubating cells with 200 µM of etoposide (1 h at 37 °C) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA). Moreover, the negative controls were obtained by incubating cells only with secondary goat anti-mouse 488 IgG (1:530 dilution in PBS) (H+L) (Life Technologies, Rockford, USA) for 1 h at 37 °C; 5000 event files for each sample were acquired individually in a FACS flow cytometer (BD FACSverse, New Jersey, USA) [26] .…”
Section: Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%