2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoride removal using Regenerated Spent Bleaching Earth (RSBE) from groundwater: Case study on Kuhbonan water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the data regarding fluoride absorption on bauxite particles by isotherm showed that using bauxite from the Jajarm, Khidbas, Khezri, Shahid Nilchian, Mendon, Hassanabad, Biglar, Shahbalaghi, and Tash mines with a correlation coefficient greater than 0.955, fluoride absorption obeyed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Sujana et al, Malakootian et al, and Das et al used bauxite as a fluoride adsorbent, and their experimental data was better described by the Langmuir absorption model (8,34,40). These mentioned studies are consistent with this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analysis of the data regarding fluoride absorption on bauxite particles by isotherm showed that using bauxite from the Jajarm, Khidbas, Khezri, Shahid Nilchian, Mendon, Hassanabad, Biglar, Shahbalaghi, and Tash mines with a correlation coefficient greater than 0.955, fluoride absorption obeyed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Sujana et al, Malakootian et al, and Das et al used bauxite as a fluoride adsorbent, and their experimental data was better described by the Langmuir absorption model (8,34,40). These mentioned studies are consistent with this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A study was conducted in Iran in 2011 by Malakootian et al to remove fluoride using regenerated spent bleaching earth. In this study, increasing the amount of adsorbent from 10 to 20 g/L (concentration of fluoride = 2.5 mg/L) increased removal efficiency from 66.41% to 74.01% (34). In India, Mohapatra et al used mineral oxides to remove fluoride.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…93.5% at pH 5. Because at low pH the concentration of H + is high [19], as H + ions were being removed by the biosorbent, instead of the Pb 2+ ions, [21,35] at higher concentration of H + ions, the biosorbent becomes more positive charge on the surface and the attraction between biosorbent and Pb 2+ ions is reduced [36]. At higher pH the capacity of the adsorbent reduced, the reduction in adsorption may be due to the increasing of OH -ions, or Pb 2+ ions were precipitated as lead hydroxide [2,37].…”
Section: Transmission Electron Microscopy (Tem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution was agitated for 120 min and the residual sulfate ion in solutions was determined, also the distribution of chloride ion depends upon pH of the solution were studied (Malakootian et al 2011). …”
Section: Effect Of Ph Value On Sulfate Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%