Proceedings Sixth International Symposium on Advanced Research in Asynchronous Circuits and Systems (ASYNC 2000) (Cat. No. PR00
DOI: 10.1109/async.2000.836774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal verification of safety properties in timed circuits

Abstract: The incorporation of timing makes circuit verification computationally expensive. This paper proposes a new approach for the verification of timed circuits. Rather than calculating the exact timed state space, a conservative overestimation that fulfills the property under verification is derived. Timing analysis with absolute delays is efficiently performed at the level of event structures and transformed into a set of relative timing constraints. With this approach, conventional symbolic techniques for reacha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 compares our new gate-level timing verification method using standard benchmarks against results for the timed automata tool KRONOS [9], a conservative approximation method described in [14], and the ATACS explicit state timing verifier [12]. For KRONOS runtimes, an entry with a question mark indicates the amount of time after which the verification ran out of memory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 compares our new gate-level timing verification method using standard benchmarks against results for the timed automata tool KRONOS [9], a conservative approximation method described in [14], and the ATACS explicit state timing verifier [12]. For KRONOS runtimes, an entry with a question mark indicates the amount of time after which the verification ran out of memory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This verification must be extremely efficient to allow for many alternative designs to be considered during technology mapping. Current timing verification algorithms [13,3,14,10,9,18] often suffer from state explosion problems because each node in the circuit netlist is treated as a new state variable, potentially doubling the number of states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work on incorporating relative time into reachability analysis has been carried out particularly in the area of asynchronus circuit design [3,9]. The construction of lazy transition systems is used during synthesis to prune a previously explored untimed state space of those areas which cannot be reached due to the timing constraints of the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to timed methods, such as [5] and [10], metric-free verification is less computationally-intensive and integrates more easily within a hierarchical verification framework that permits non-determinism. Metric-free verification methods for relative timing are also used in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%