2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.054201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward approximation as a mean-field approximation for the Anderson and many-body localization transitions

Abstract: In this paper we analyze the predictions of the forward approximation in some models which exhibit an Anderson (single-) or many-body localized phase. This approximation, which consists in summing over the amplitudes of only the shortest paths in the locator expansion, is known to over-estimate the critical value of the disorder which determines the onset of the localized phase. Nevertheless, the results provided by the approximation become more and more accurate as the local coordination (dimensionality) of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eigenstate phases of H p do as well, yet the eigenstates are never localized at any finite p. They are instead non-ergodic, in a manner that comes to resemble localization as p increases. We show this by studying the eigenstates within perturbation theory and the forward-scattering approximation [42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eigenstate phases of H p do as well, yet the eigenstates are never localized at any finite p. They are instead non-ergodic, in a manner that comes to resemble localization as p increases. We show this by studying the eigenstates within perturbation theory and the forward-scattering approximation [42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eigenstate phases of H p do as well, yet the eigenstates are never localized at any finite p. They are instead non-ergodic, in a manner that comes to resemble localization as p increases. We show this by studying the eigenstates within perturbation theory and the forward-scattering approximation [42].Before we turn to detailed analysis, it is useful to consider the p-spin models in terms of Anderson localization on the N -dimensional hypercube defined by the σ z configuration space. H C p is then a random potential and H Q causes hops along the edges of the hypercube.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Heisenberg model with random fields the transition value has been estimated through other numerical evidence 38,53,54 to be equal to h H c = 3.7(2) at the center of the band for the parameters that we used, although its actual value could be larger (h H c ≥ 4.5 according to 55 ); an equivalent highquality numerical result is not available for the Aubry-André model, although experimental works find the localization transition at similar values 49 . Interestingly, as soon as interactions are introduced, the Aubry-André model acquires almost identical features to the Heisenberg with random fields model first studied by total correlations in 39 .…”
Section: B Many-body Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the simple formula (6) is derived under the sole assumption that the conserved operators have spectrum ±1, it could be applied to the conserved pseudo-spins constructed numerically in Refs. [46][47][48] for non-perturbative interactions by means of renormalization procedures or diagonalizing flows.It would be interesting to extend this calculation beyond the lowest orders, exploiting for example the expansion for the conserved quantities in the forward approximation [30,49], to discuss the behavior of the remanent magnetization when approaching the delocalization threshold. An interesting question is whether at the delocalization transition, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be interesting to extend this calculation beyond the lowest orders, exploiting for example the expansion for the conserved quantities in the forward approximation [30,49], to discuss the behavior of the remanent magnetization when approaching the delocalization threshold. An interesting question is whether at the delocalization transition, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%