2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fruit characteristics, soluble sugar compositions and transcriptome analysis during the development of Citrus maxima “seedless”, and identification of SUS and INV genes involved in sucrose degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, we found that the sucrose content decreased, while fructose rapidly increased, in the late stage of the development of loquat fruit. In citrus, this can be explained by the conversion of sucrose to hexose via sucrose degradation in the later stages of fruit development [53]. In our study, the content of sucrose in the two cultivars was negatively correlated with the activity and gene expression level of SS-C.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Interestingly, we found that the sucrose content decreased, while fructose rapidly increased, in the late stage of the development of loquat fruit. In citrus, this can be explained by the conversion of sucrose to hexose via sucrose degradation in the later stages of fruit development [53]. In our study, the content of sucrose in the two cultivars was negatively correlated with the activity and gene expression level of SS-C.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Sucrose is converted into glucose and fructose by INV, which are classified into CWINV, CINV and VINV based on subcellular localization 33 . In pummelo, ten INVs have been reported to be associated with sucrose degradation, among which a VINV gene ( VIN2 ) was suggested to be closely related to soluble hexose accumulation in the vacuole 39 . We found that most INV members were down‐regulated in HP fruit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The nla mutant was more sensitive to N limitation than the WT, showing an early senescence phenotype (Figure 1). It is reported that RNS3, SAG29, and VIN2 play important roles in the regulation of leaf senescence [30][31][32]. Moreover, ORE1 is reported to act downstream of NLA, contributing to the regulation of leaf senescence [23].…”
Section: Transcriptional Expression Patterns Of Genes Regulated By Nlmentioning
confidence: 99%