2021
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional trait dimensions of trophic metacommunities

Abstract: of multiple functions in different meta-ecosystems, 2) functional trait analogues across taxa, 3) dimension responses and effects on gradients of meta-ecosystems and 4) matching of functionally analogous traits between trophic levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is at intermediate dispersal rates that the geographic isolation gradient of communities may play the most important role in determining biodiversity (e.g., Fortuna et al, 2006;Economo and Keitt, 2010;Cañedo-Argüelles et al, 2015). Notably, we have no clear understanding of how the spatial structure of a real landscape interacting with species dispersal abilities may determine metacommunity biodiversity at intermediate dispersal rates (Hillebrand et al, 2018;Thompson et al, 2020;Bauer et al, 2021;Fortin et al, 2021;Suzuki and Economo, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is at intermediate dispersal rates that the geographic isolation gradient of communities may play the most important role in determining biodiversity (e.g., Fortuna et al, 2006;Economo and Keitt, 2010;Cañedo-Argüelles et al, 2015). Notably, we have no clear understanding of how the spatial structure of a real landscape interacting with species dispersal abilities may determine metacommunity biodiversity at intermediate dispersal rates (Hillebrand et al, 2018;Thompson et al, 2020;Bauer et al, 2021;Fortin et al, 2021;Suzuki and Economo, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, we need to acknowledge that other mechanisms besides environmental filters also affect community assembly (Cadotte & Tucker, 2017), which were not specifically addressed here. Namely, biotic interactions might contribute greatly to the assembly of ecological communities (Bauer et al, 2021), particularly through species sorting at small spatial scales resulting in trait divergence, that is, an increase in FD (Weiher & Keddy, 1995). Thus, we would expect the greatest contribution of biotic interactions to the patch‐to‐object step.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such filters can act at different spatial scales (Jiménez‐Alfaro et al, 2018), ranging from small‐scale microhabitat conditions and priority effects during microhabitat colonisation (Song et al, 2017) up to landscape‐scale or even continental and global scale factors (Harmon‐Threatt & Ackerly, 2013; Mori et al, 2018). Thus, the assembly of local communities can be framed as a process of several hierarchical filtering events (Bauer et al, 2021). Studies addressing community assembly as a multi‐scale process indicate the role of different mechanisms acting at different scales (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A framework was developed using functional trait dimensions of trophic metacommunities for a more unified approach on metacommunity ecology across trophic levels (Bauer et al, 2021). This streamlined approach in combination of the elements of SCO infrastructure will be utilized for upcoming research questions, e.g., understanding how dispersal and competition processes form the typical salt marsh zonation and how these communities will respond to the changing environment (Bearup and Blasius, 2016;Balke et al, 2017;Redelstein et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Biodiversity-ecosystem Functioning (Bef) Field Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%