2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FWDGAN-based data augmentation for tomato leaf disease identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of the related work on plant disease identification based on leaf images and the result comparison of some of them is shown in Table 11 . As can be seen from both Table 11 and Figure 13 , our model outperformed the previous models, surpassing that of Li et al [ 58 ], which was the closest in performance, with a +0.75% performance gain. Whereby some authors used the accuracy metric to measure their performance, we recorded a much higher accuracy but chose to benchmark against our F1 score value, which is regarded as a much better form of performance measure for classification problems, since it combines both the precision and recall of the model in question.…”
Section: Evaluation Metrics Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…A summary of the related work on plant disease identification based on leaf images and the result comparison of some of them is shown in Table 11 . As can be seen from both Table 11 and Figure 13 , our model outperformed the previous models, surpassing that of Li et al [ 58 ], which was the closest in performance, with a +0.75% performance gain. Whereby some authors used the accuracy metric to measure their performance, we recorded a much higher accuracy but chose to benchmark against our F1 score value, which is regarded as a much better form of performance measure for classification problems, since it combines both the precision and recall of the model in question.…”
Section: Evaluation Metrics Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In formula (5), P represents the target detection accuracy of the network (in this paper, the recognition accuracy of citrus, apple, grape, and other fruit targets) and R represents the recall rate of the network. e precision in the evaluation index refers to the average value of each correct detection rate in the fruit target detection samples.…”
Section: Self-comparison Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e precision in the evaluation index refers to the average value of each correct detection rate in the fruit target detection samples. TP in equation (5) indicates that the predicted value is positive and the actual value is positive. From the perspective of the calculation formula, F1 value is the weighted average of the accuracy of the model and the recall rate of the model.…”
Section: Self-comparison Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adverse effects caused by abnormal samples are mitigated through the normalization ability of SELU. Furthermore, the negative semi-axis of SELU is no longer set to 0, which solves the problem of nerve death in RELU [47]. It is worth noting that when SCAE adopts SELU as the activation function, the As can be seen from Figures 12 and 13, for different variants of AE, the optimal activation function is different.…”
Section: The Selection Of Activation Function For Aementioning
confidence: 99%