1956
DOI: 10.1002/cite.330280603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gasdispergierung in Flüssigkeiten durch Düsen bei hohen Durchsätzen

Abstract: AuswertungsmethodeDie Photographien zeigten Blasen verschiedenster GroRe und Gestalt, oft einander uberdeckend, Bild 2 bis 9.Chemie-1ng.-Tech.28. Jahrg. 1956 / Nr. 6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1956
1956
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Die Blasenschwarme wurden in verschiedener Hohe iiber der Gasverteilerplatte photographiert und die Filmnegative ausgewertet. Die Aufnahmetechnik entsprach weitgehend der von W. Siemes und K. Gunther in einer fruheren Arbeit[2] verwendeten. Ferner wurde aus den Ruhe-und den Expansionshohen der Blasensaule ihr relativer Fliissigkeitsgehalt bestimmt.…”
unclassified
“…Die Blasenschwarme wurden in verschiedener Hohe iiber der Gasverteilerplatte photographiert und die Filmnegative ausgewertet. Die Aufnahmetechnik entsprach weitgehend der von W. Siemes und K. Gunther in einer fruheren Arbeit[2] verwendeten. Ferner wurde aus den Ruhe-und den Expansionshohen der Blasensaule ihr relativer Fliissigkeitsgehalt bestimmt.…”
unclassified
“…As can be seen from Eq. [9] the velocity is observed to increase with increasing bubble size and decreasing bubble spacing, as it should if proximity or wake phenomenon significantly affect the bubble velocity. The only slight increase in the amount of data successfully described by the model (i.e., from 87.7 to 88.0 pct) is a reflection of the fact that the bubble spacing alone accounts for only 14.7 pct of the explained data, whereas the bubble diameter alone accounts for 93.6 pct of the data.…”
Section: Gas Bubble Velocities Under Dynamic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[9] the velocity is observed to increase with increasing bubble size and decreasing bubble spacing, as it should if proximity or wake phenomenon significantly affect the bubble velocity. The only slight increase in the amount of data successfully described by the model (i.e., from 87.7 to 88.0 pct) is a reflection of the fact that the bubble spacing alone accounts for only 14.7 pct of the explained data, whereas the bubble diameter alone accounts for 93.6 pct of the data.…”
Section: Gas Bubble Velocities Under Dynamic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For velocity as a function of bubble size only, the expression v b = 29.69(db) TM cm s -~ [8] was found to best describe the data. Considering both bubble size and proximity, the relation v b = 27.88(db) ~176 (Sb) "~176 cm s -1 [9] was determined to be satisfactory. The bubble spacing, Sb, was taken as the center to center distance of the rising bubbles.…”
Section: Gas Bubble Velocities Under Dynamic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%