Gender and conversational dominance in Japanese conversation

Abstract

A number of studies have been conducted on "dominance" as reflected in spoken interactional features, most of which deal with English. Many of these studies adopt a quantitative approach, examining the amount and distribution of interactional features such as amount of talk, interruptions and overlaps, turn-taking, questions, and topic initiations, and they have drawn conclusions on "dominance" accordingly. The present study explores gender dominance in conversation by analyzing conversational data from eight Japanese dyads by integrating quantitative and qualitative analyses. The quantitative analysis of two dimensions of conversational dominance, sequential dominance and participatory dominance, does not show any obvious gender dominance; however, the qualitative analysis of three of the dyads finds a clear pattern of male speakers' self-oriented conversational style, which is manifested in their storytelling and claiming expertise, and this is supported by female speakers' other-oriented conversational style. Gender dominance therefore is seen as a mutual construction. The conclusion discusses the importance of integrating findings from both quantitative and qualitative analyses in situated contexts to deepen understanding of the complexity of gender dominance. (Japanese conversation, gender, conversational dominance, conversational orientation, conversational style.)* I N T R O D U C T I O NStudies of the effects of gender and social dominance on conversational interaction in English have suggested that the domination of male over female is manifested in various ways in this context as a micro-institution, just as it is

Applicability of Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory to a Non-Western Culture

“…Furthermore, many studies have generally supported Lakoff's (1975) hypothesis that women are politer (i.e., hearer oriented) than men (e.g., Bodine, 1975;Ervin-Tripp, 2001;Fox, Bukatko, Hallahan, & Crawford, 2007;Hannah & Murachver, 2007;Jenkins & Aube, 2002;McMillan, Clifton, McGrath, & Gale, 1977;Mulac, Bradac, & Gibbons, 2001;Tannen, 1990). Several empirical studies with a particular focus on speech styles by native Japanese speakers also have provided general support for Lakoff's hypothesis (e.g., Ide, 1982;Itakura & Tsui, 2004;Lauwereyns, 2002;Tamaoka, Lim, Miyaoka, & Kiyama, 2010;Uchida, 1997;Usami, 2002). It suggests that gender (G) may also be an influential factor in addition to the three factors assumed by Brown and Levinson.…”

Subclinical Primary Psychopathy, but Not Physical Formidability or Attractiveness, Predicts Conversational Dominance in a Zero-Acquaintance Situation

“… [11] , [12] ) is an interaction-level phenomenon rather than a relationship-level or individual-level phenomenon. Itakura [12] , [13] distinguishes among three forms of conversational dominance. Quantitative conversational dominance is demonstrated when a given individual speaks for more time, or utters more words, than her interlocutor(s).…”

Question-declaration coupling in a university meeting talk: Discourse of social inequality and collegiality

“…Meanwhile, the five sets of the meetings would suffice (cf. Itakura & Tsui, 2004;O'Sullivan, 2010;Park, 2009;Vettin & Todt, 2004) given the microscopic nature of CA.…”