2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in creative thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
39
2
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
39
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In school B and school C, male students' enhancement is detected higher in terms of figural creativity meaning that male students tend to have higher abilities in the formation of ideas by combining patterns of shapes or images given. These findings are conformable to Matud et al [18], who find male students in secondary education have statistically higher scores on t he aspects of figural authenticity, while in higher education female students score higher on the aspect of verbal fluency. Naderi et al, [19] states that the average female score is higher than the average male score on the aspects of environmental sensitivity, self-power, intellectuality and individuality, but the average score for female is lower than male in terms of initiative and art.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In school B and school C, male students' enhancement is detected higher in terms of figural creativity meaning that male students tend to have higher abilities in the formation of ideas by combining patterns of shapes or images given. These findings are conformable to Matud et al [18], who find male students in secondary education have statistically higher scores on t he aspects of figural authenticity, while in higher education female students score higher on the aspect of verbal fluency. Naderi et al, [19] states that the average female score is higher than the average male score on the aspects of environmental sensitivity, self-power, intellectuality and individuality, but the average score for female is lower than male in terms of initiative and art.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Comparatively, a score of value p= 0.012 for a post test shows a slight difference of mean between both genders. This finding is parallel with several studies, such as Baer & Kaufman (2006);Caparrós, Barrantes-Vidal, Viñas, & Obiols, (2008);DeMoss, Milich, & DeMers (1993); Kaufman (2006);and Matud, Rodriguez, & Grande (2007) that confirmed there was no significant difference in the level of creativity between male and female. However, on the other hands, various study shows otherwise (Eysenck, 1994;Maccoby, 1990;Norfauzi & Mohammad Yusof, 2002;Reiss, 2000;Stoltzfus, Nibbelink, Vredenburg, & Hyrum, 2011).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Yaratıcı düşünme ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalarda araştırmacıların cinsiyet (Matud et al, 2007;Öncü, 2003;Gök ve Erdoğan,2011;Yaşar ve Aral, 2011), akademik başarı (Koray ve diğerleri, 2007;Aksoy, 2005), anne-baba eğitim durumu (Yaşar ve Aral, 2011), sosyo ekonomik düzey (Yaşar ve Aral, 2011), mezun olunan lise türü, (Ulukök ve diğerleri, 2012), öğretmen davranışları (Yenilmez ve Yolcu, 2007), öğrenme stilleri (Tümkaya, 2011), okul öncesi eğitimi alma durumu (Yaşar ve Aral, 2010) gibi değişkenlerden etkilenme durumları üzerinde çalışmalar yaptıkları tespit edilmiştir. Gök ve Erdoğan (2011) tarafından yapılan "Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Yaratıcı Düşünme Düzeyleri ve Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimlerinin İncelenmesi" adlı araştırmada yaratıcı düşünmenin cinsiyet, akademik başarı, anne eğitim durumu değişkenlerinden etkilendiği, mezun olunan lise türü, baba eğitim durumu değişkenlerinden etkilenmediği; eleştirel düşünmenin ise araştırmada ele alınan değişkenlerin hiçbirisinden etkilenmediği ortaya konulmuştur.…”
Section: Yaratıcılık Ve Yaratıcı Düşünmeunclassified