2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40009-013-0149-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj & Cosson] as Revealed by Agronomic Traits and RAPD Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it indicates ample scope for further improvement through simple selection for different quantitative traits for mustard improvement. The variability in concurrence with the results of Singh et al, 2013. None of the genotypes was found to be most promising collectively for all the quantitative traits. However, some genotypes could be identified as promising for different traits ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, it indicates ample scope for further improvement through simple selection for different quantitative traits for mustard improvement. The variability in concurrence with the results of Singh et al, 2013. None of the genotypes was found to be most promising collectively for all the quantitative traits. However, some genotypes could be identified as promising for different traits ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Low plant height is considered as desirable trait due to ease in carrying out agronomic practices; hence genotypes of cluster-III may be used as donor for this trait. Such results are in concurrence with the results of Singh et al (2013). The fourth cluster comprised of 23 genotypes from three centers (except two from IARI, New Delhi).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus the obtained results confirmed that the use of diversity analysis is a good tool to determine the phenotypic differences among the genotypes, which agrees with the results of Crossa and Cornelius (1997);Marijanovic-Jeromela et al (2009). Similar results concerning the genetic diversity for yield and its component traits have also been reported by Singh et al (2013); Vinu et al (2013); Chandra et al (2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Several genetic or phylogenetic relationships have been proposed for different taxas within B. rapa, based on morphology, geographical distribution, isozymes and different molecular markers (Zhao et al 2005). Molecular markers are more effective to detect the variability in Indian mustard (Singh et al 2013). Analysis by molecular markers help in choosing parental types for mapping populations, marker assisted selections and back crossing schemes and thus diversity studies conducted using various markers help the breeders to improve crop species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%