2006
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Toxicity Assessment: Employing the Best Science for Human Safety Evaluation Part II: Performances of the In Vitro Micronucleus Test Compared to the Mouse Lymphoma Assay and the In Vitro Chromosome Aberration Assay

Abstract: The in vitro micronucleus test is commonly used in the early stages of pharmaceutical development as a predictive tool for the regulatory mouse lymphoma assay or in vitro chromosome aberration test. The accumulated data from this assay leads to the suggestion that it could be used as an alternative to the chromosome aberration test or the mouse lymphoma assay in the regulatory genotoxicity battery. In this paper, we present the results of the in vitro micronucleus test on L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells with 25 co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This activity could be confirmed in the present study with metabolic activation at a rather high cytotoxic concentration (relative total growth rate of 20% relative to the control). Generally, this assay system is known for a rather high rate of false positive responses, especially at cytotoxic concentrations (Caldwell, 1993;Lorge et al, 2007;Parry et al, 2010;Reeve et al, 2012). In other in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays, eugenol shows mixed results, although most of them are negative (EFSA, 2009).…”
Section: In Vitro Mammalian Cell Genotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This activity could be confirmed in the present study with metabolic activation at a rather high cytotoxic concentration (relative total growth rate of 20% relative to the control). Generally, this assay system is known for a rather high rate of false positive responses, especially at cytotoxic concentrations (Caldwell, 1993;Lorge et al, 2007;Parry et al, 2010;Reeve et al, 2012). In other in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays, eugenol shows mixed results, although most of them are negative (EFSA, 2009).…”
Section: In Vitro Mammalian Cell Genotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro micronucleus test is widely used as a screening assay to assess cytogenetic damage in mammalian cells [1][2][3][4][5]. Its popularity is largely due to the fact that it can be executed with less technical expertise relative to chromosome aberration analyses, and because it is capable of detecting aneugens as well as clastogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of chromosome aberration test indicate that there was no significant difference between the different dosage groups and the negative control group(p>0.05), which meant that the samples would not cause chromosome aberration. The in vitro micronucleus test started to be used in genotoxicity in the 1970s [15].It can detect chromosomal damage in a further stage [16]. It is also a reliable method for evaluat¬ing the effect of genetic toxicity on chromosomes [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%