2015
DOI: 10.3923/ajar.2015.305.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype by Environment Interaction for Protein Content of Malt Barley Genotypes Using the Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction Effect Model (AMMI) and Genotype Plus Genotype by Environment Interaction (GGE) Biplot

Abstract: Protein content is a prerequisite for malting quality and it is highly affected by environment. The objective of this study was to quantify the magnitude of genotype by environment interaction and assess the protein content of malt barley genotypes in diversified locations. Eight malt barley genotypes were evaluated in randomized complete block design using three replications at six locations of Tigray, Ethiopia durining 2013/2014 main cropping season. The additive main effect and multiplicative interaction ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that Tengeru was able to provide much information about differences among genotypes than other locations. In line with explanation by Mehari et al (2015), Tengeru was more strongly correlated to Mlangarini as the angle between them was small, while the angle between both Tangeru and Mlangarini with Selian was bigger and hence not closely related to them. Therefore, the biplot identified Tengeru to be the test environment that is close to an ideal environment which is eventually defined to be both discriminating and representative (Yan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Test Environment Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This means that Tengeru was able to provide much information about differences among genotypes than other locations. In line with explanation by Mehari et al (2015), Tengeru was more strongly correlated to Mlangarini as the angle between them was small, while the angle between both Tangeru and Mlangarini with Selian was bigger and hence not closely related to them. Therefore, the biplot identified Tengeru to be the test environment that is close to an ideal environment which is eventually defined to be both discriminating and representative (Yan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Test Environment Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This means that Tengeru was able to provide much information about differences among genotypes than other locations. In relation to the concept explained by Mehari et al (2015), Tengeru was more strongly correlated to Mlangarini as the angle between them was small (Figure 3), while the angle between both Tangeru and Mlangarini with Selian was bigger and hence not closely related to them. Therefore, the biplot (Figure 3) identified Tengeru to be the test environment that is close to an ideal environment which is eventually defined to be both discriminating and representative (Yan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Gge Biplot Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, due to low productivity, poor malt quality, and very limited expansion of malt barley production, the net import bill for malt barley jumped from US$240 thousand in 1997 to US$40 Abiotic and biotic stresses, weak technology generation and transfer, limited availability and access to inputs, sub-optimal application of fertilizers, and poor access to markets due to poor linkages between the farmer producers and the brewing industry are the main constraints responsible for low productivity, poor malt quality and limited expansion of malt barley production in Ethiopia. Among abiotic stresses, it is a well-established fact that the physical environment strongly affects the genetic potential and quality of malt barley (Ajith, 2009;Muhe, 2011;EIAR, 2015;Mehari, Alamerew, & Lakew, 2015;Mekonnen, 2013;Rashid, Abate, Lemma, Warner, Kasa, & Minot, 2015). In our study, the physical environment includes the soil type, soil depth, soil pH, soil texture, soil drainage, land slope, altitude, length of growing period, and climate (rainfall and temperature).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%