2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00332-016-9314-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Integrators for Higher-Order Variational Systems and Their Application to Optimal Control

Abstract: Numerical methods that preserve geometric invariants of the system, such as energy, momentum or the symplectic form, are called geometric integrators. In this paper we present a method to construct symplectic-momentum integrators for higher-order Lagrangian systems. Given a regular higher-order Lagrangian L : T (k) Q → R with k ≥ 1, the resulting discrete equations define a generally implicit numerical integrator algorithm on T (k−1) Q × T (k−1) Q that approximates the flow of the higher-order Euler-Lagrange e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we are currently working to add uncertainties in order to further explore the robustness of the proposed controller. We also plan to study the construction of force variational integrators in optimal control problems, in a similar fashion to [35] and [36], dynamic interpolation problems [37], and obstacle avoidance problems [38] for the cooperative task between quadrotors UAVs presented in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we are currently working to add uncertainties in order to further explore the robustness of the proposed controller. We also plan to study the construction of force variational integrators in optimal control problems, in a similar fashion to [35] and [36], dynamic interpolation problems [37], and obstacle avoidance problems [38] for the cooperative task between quadrotors UAVs presented in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the matrix of system (15) and R(V, V ) is given by (16). Denote the matrix −R(V, V ) by A, the matrix vv t by D and the constant −K v 2 by η, so that A = ηI n + KD.…”
Section: Riemannian Cubicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In optimal control applications such as rigid body control in robotics, spacecraft control in aeronautics, quantum control in quantum information processing, 3D animation in computer graphics or regression schemes for computational anatomy in medical imaging, the problem of path planning requires the initial and final path position and velocity to be prescribed. Developing geometric variational integrators for optimal control problems is a subject of growing interest, especially challenging when boundary conditions are imposed (see, for instance, [16] and the recent work of Bloch and collaborators in [9]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our focus is on the discretization procedure and the mathematical tools that it involves, whereas the numerical behavior is planned to be explored in further works. However, regarding the local truncation error and stability (which will be still ensured thanks to the symplecticity of the HO variational integrators), discussed in the last paragraphs, the construction of L E d for HO systems has been developed in [21]. In this reference the reader can find some numerical tests and more details on numerical aspects.…”
Section: Satisfying (I)-(iii) If and Only If γ(T) Is A Solution Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%