2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric reconstruction methods for electron tomography

Abstract: a b s t r a c tElectron tomography is becoming an increasingly important tool in materials science for studying the three-dimensional morphologies and chemical compositions of nanostructures. The image quality obtained by many current algorithms is seriously affected by the problems of missing wedge artefacts and non-linear projection intensities due to diffraction effects. The former refers to the fact that data cannot be acquired over the full 1801 tilt range; the latter implies that for some orientations, c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3,40 In the present study, limitations in the available specimen tilt range to 645 would be likely to result in pronounced artefacts in such a reconstruction. 41 Here, on the assumption of cylindrical symmetry (see Sec. III), we inferred the three-dimensional distributions of electrostatic potential and electric field around the needle from the three charge density distributions indicated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,40 In the present study, limitations in the available specimen tilt range to 645 would be likely to result in pronounced artefacts in such a reconstruction. 41 Here, on the assumption of cylindrical symmetry (see Sec. III), we inferred the three-dimensional distributions of electrostatic potential and electric field around the needle from the three charge density distributions indicated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remedy this problem, the fix probability can be decreased such that noise is also spread over a large random subset of pixels. While this improves the accuracy of DART with noisy projection data to some extent, it does introduce heavy salt and pepper noise, as was also observed in [13].…”
Section: Algorithm Detailsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The middle pixel of the kernel is weighted by a smoothing factor b, the other pixels in the kernel are weighted by (1 − b)/8. Although the smoothing is not used in every implementation of DART [13], it is used in the original paper [8]. The process repeats from step 2.…”
Section: Algorithm Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it is not partially differentiable). In a very recent paper [1] an implementation of this algorithm in Matlab is compared with other geometric reconstruction techniques.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%