2015
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global, regional and local health impacts of civil aviation emissions

Abstract: Aviation emissions impact surface air quality at multiple scales-from near-airport pollution peaks associated with airport landing and take off (LTO) emissions, to intercontinental pollution attributable to aircraft cruise emissions. Previous studies have quantified aviation's air quality impacts around a specific airport, in a specific region, or at the global scale. However, no study has assessed the air quality and human health impacts of aviation, capturing effects on all aforementioned scales. This study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all PM species considered, sources in Asia represented over 60 % of the global anthropogenic total (Table 7), with residential combustion being the most important sector, although its share declines with increasing particle size: about 60 % for BC and OC, 45 % for PM 2.5 and less than 40 % for PM 10 for which large combustion sources and industrial processes are equally important (Table 8). Yim et al (2015), and based on global fuel consumption and ranges of emission factors from Kinsey (2009). b GFED3.1 without agricultural waste burning that is included based on GAINS estimates in category "Agriculture"; PM 10 value based on TPM (total particulate matter); PM 1 not available in GFED -here assumed equal to PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all PM species considered, sources in Asia represented over 60 % of the global anthropogenic total (Table 7), with residential combustion being the most important sector, although its share declines with increasing particle size: about 60 % for BC and OC, 45 % for PM 2.5 and less than 40 % for PM 10 for which large combustion sources and industrial processes are equally important (Table 8). Yim et al (2015), and based on global fuel consumption and ranges of emission factors from Kinsey (2009). b GFED3.1 without agricultural waste burning that is included based on GAINS estimates in category "Agriculture"; PM 10 value based on TPM (total particulate matter); PM 1 not available in GFED -here assumed equal to PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Yim et al (2019), the initial and boundary air quality conditions were provided by GEOS-Chem v8.3.2, with a spatial resolution of 4°× 5°of GEOS-Chem (Bey et al, 2001). GEOS-Chem is a global chemical and transport model that has been commonly used in various studies on global air quality and extensively evaluated through observation (Yim et al, 2015). Emissions outside the PRD region were provided by the INTEX-B 2006 regional emission inventories (Guenther et al, 2006) and the leaf area index derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer were used to estimate biogenic emissions.…”
Section: Chemistry Transport Model and Its Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By embedding this study within the previous global study of WEST2013, we are the first to investigate the co-benefits of foreign GHG mitigation for US air quality and human health. Previous studies have also investigated the effects of air pollution from specific emission sectors on premature mortality, both globally (Lelieveld et al 2015, Morita et al 2014, Yim et al 2015, Silva et al 2016b and regionally (Caiazzo et al 2013, Fann et al 2012). Here we conduct three new sensitivity simulations to quantify the air quality and health co-benefits of GHG reductions in three US emission sectors: industry, residential and energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%