2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravel wash mud, a quarry waste material as supplementary cementitious material (SCM)

Abstract: The suitability of gravel wash mud (GWM), a sludge waste from gravel quarrying, is examined for its use as a partial Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) clinker substitute. The gravel wash mud was dried, milled into a fine powder and calcined at 750°C, 850°C and 950°C. In this study, various characterisation methods including particle size distribution (PSD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and the simultaneous thermal analysis (STA) were applied on the calcined GWM powders to determine the optima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost any type of mud can be used for construction once all the properties are tested and validated and the required ingredients added. Recently investigated mud materials include gravel wash muds (GWM) [ 11 , 12 ] and waste mud from gravel quarries. These refer to wet deposits that are generated during the extraction of gravel and the gravel aggregates in addition to sand washing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost any type of mud can be used for construction once all the properties are tested and validated and the required ingredients added. Recently investigated mud materials include gravel wash muds (GWM) [ 11 , 12 ] and waste mud from gravel quarries. These refer to wet deposits that are generated during the extraction of gravel and the gravel aggregates in addition to sand washing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the only sample that had a NGS was M3 at 28 days (6.41%), a value that is corroborated with Figure 14. However, additional to the propose of the authors, 29 it can be said that M3 also presents a RGS of around 26.41% since the proposed methodology visually underestimates the results of NGS obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This was done in order to obtain a better understanding of the impact of the SCS when a certain percentage of cement is replaced by waste sample. So, if the SAI obtained is equal to or >100%, the authors 29 indicate a net gain in strength (NGS) while if the SAI is <100%, an arithmetic operation described in Figure 2 is performed to find out if there is a relative gain in strength (RGS; when the RSI is greater than or equal to 0%) or if, on the contrary, there is a relative loss in strength (RLS; RSI <0%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations