2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.68.214504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guided vortex motion in superconductors with a square antidot array

Abstract: We have measured the in-plane anisotropy of the vortex mobility in a thin Pb film with a square array of antidots. The Lorentz force, acting on the vortices, was rotated by adding two perpendicular currents and keeping the amplitude of the net current constant. One set of voltage probes was used to detect the vortex motion. We show that the pinning landscape provided by the square antidot lattice influences the vortex motion in two different ways. First, the modulus of the vortex velocity becomes angular depen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
75
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
75
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to unveil the lattice symmetry contribution we can assume that each dipole behaves as an effective isotropic pinning center, very much like a lattice of circular antidots or magnetic dots. In this case it has been previously shown [10] that the minimum pinning force is along the principal axes of the pinning lattice [broken line in Fig.1(c) and (d)]. On the other hand, ignoring the presence of the lattice and just considering the pinning force produced by one single dipole gives rise to a strongly anisotropic pinning force [25] [schematically displayed as an off-centered circle in Fig.1(c) and (d)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to unveil the lattice symmetry contribution we can assume that each dipole behaves as an effective isotropic pinning center, very much like a lattice of circular antidots or magnetic dots. In this case it has been previously shown [10] that the minimum pinning force is along the principal axes of the pinning lattice [broken line in Fig.1(c) and (d)]. On the other hand, ignoring the presence of the lattice and just considering the pinning force produced by one single dipole gives rise to a strongly anisotropic pinning force [25] [schematically displayed as an off-centered circle in Fig.1(c) and (d)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These systems rely essentially on either static arrays, such as pinning centers [2,3,4,5] and vortex-antivortex generators [6,7], or components influencing the vortex dynamics like channels [8,9,10,11] and ratchets [12,13]. The ultimate motivation behind the manipulation of the local vortex density is to enhance the performance of superconductor-based devices by reducing the noise in squid-based systems [14,15], gaining control on superconducting THz emitters [16] or even providing a way to predefine the optical transmission through the system [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Prozorov et al applied a sonication method to produce magnetic Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles embedded in the MgB 2 bulk, resulting in a superconductor-ferromagnetic composite which exhibited enhancement of the magnetic hysteresis due to the improved vortex pinning by the magnetic nanoparticles [4]. In conventional superconductors, submicron magnetic dots in a specially designed pattern have been used as artificial pinning centers in superconductor thin films [5,6]. Because of the important role of Fe as a commonly used sheath material for the fabrication of MgB 2 there is an urgent need to clarify the effects of Fe doping on the superconducting properties, in particular on the flux pinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at high temperatures these commensurability effects occur only in a very narrow window of fields [2]. Moreover, for particular current orientations the periodic pinning might also promote an undesired channeling of vortices [3,4]. In principle, these limitations could be prevented by introducing a random distribution of pinning centers at expenses of loosing the majority of the matching features [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%