2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Height-diameter allometry and above ground biomass in tropical montane forests: Insights from the Albertine Rift in Africa

Abstract: Tropical montane forests provide an important natural laboratory to test ecological theory. While it is well-known that some aspects of forest structure change with altitude, little is known on the effects of altitude on above ground biomass (AGB), particularly with regard to changing height-diameter allometry. To address this we investigate (1) the effects of altitude on height-diameter allometry, (2) how different height-diameter allometric models affect above ground biomass estimates; and (3) how other fore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(123 reference statements)
7
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed spatial structure reinforces the dangers of applying allometric relationships validated in different locations, in a limited number of sampling locations or at different spatial scales than the area of interest (e.g., models N1 and N2 were validated from a single site in northeastern Gabon). Of the covariates applied to explain the variation in D:H model bias, soil type was by far the most informative, which is consistent with several previous studies linking soil parameters to AGB estimates (e.g., Cleveland et al 2011, Ledo et al 2016b, Imani et al 2017. The published models typically performed adequately on the two most common soil types (ferralitic and coastal sedimentary), presumably because previously published allometric equations were based on data from these habitat types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The observed spatial structure reinforces the dangers of applying allometric relationships validated in different locations, in a limited number of sampling locations or at different spatial scales than the area of interest (e.g., models N1 and N2 were validated from a single site in northeastern Gabon). Of the covariates applied to explain the variation in D:H model bias, soil type was by far the most informative, which is consistent with several previous studies linking soil parameters to AGB estimates (e.g., Cleveland et al 2011, Ledo et al 2016b, Imani et al 2017. The published models typically performed adequately on the two most common soil types (ferralitic and coastal sedimentary), presumably because previously published allometric equations were based on data from these habitat types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…, Imani et al. ). The published models typically performed adequately on the two most common soil types (ferralitic and coastal sedimentary), presumably because previously published allometric equations were based on data from these habitat types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Biomass in each part of the plant increases proportionately with the larger diameter of the tree. The high ability of trees to store carbon free from air depends on the diameter of trees (Imani et al 2017) and tree height (Fu and Wu 2011). The estimated of total carbon stock value in the Perancak Estuary is 22.18±11.76 tonC ha -1 and the amount of CO2 sequestration estimation is 81.41±43.18 tonC ha -1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%