Horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: comparison with a bone-splitting method in a dog model

Funaki, Katsuyuki; Takahashi, Tsuneo; Yamuchi, Kensuke

doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.005

Cited by 42 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Soft tissue response around the block seemed to differ between sides. FUNAKI et al reported that the keratinized tissue gain with horizontal DO is greater than in the conventional augmentation method 8 . In the conventional bonegrafting technique, the elongation of the soft tissues involves mainly the movable mucous membrane.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Histological and histomorphometrical comparative study of β-tricalcium phosphate block grafts and periosteal expansion osteogenesis for alveolar bone augmentation

Yamauchi

Takahashi

Funaki

et al. 2010

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Histological and histomorphometrical comparative study of β-tricalcium phosphate block grafts and periosteal expansion osteogenesis for alveolar bone augmentation

Yamauchi

Takahashi

Funaki

et al. 2010

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Funaki et al. () reported that the keratinized tissue gain on the DO side was greater than that on the bone splitting side in a dog model. In conventional bone grafting and vertical alveolar distraction, the elongation of the soft tissues involves mainly the movable mucous membrane.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant: long‐term results

Yamauchi

Takahashi

Nogami

et al. 2012

Clinical Oral Implants Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…BG, bone graft; CBR, cortical bone repositioning; D, defect because of the advantage of simultaneous lengthening of the surrounding soft tissue 16,17. BG, bone graft; CBR, cortical bone repositioning; D, defect F I G U R E 5 Results by area (mm 2 ) of BG, CBR, and D areas at 2, 5, and 8 weeks.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of the bone regeneration following cortical bone repositioning in a rabbit mandible

Cruz

Yamauchi

Odajima

et al. 2019

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Although bone graft (BG) is the gold standard for bone augmentation, its use is hampered by donor site morbidity and limited quantity.Purpose: To evaluate the capabilities of bone formation by cortical bone repositioning (CBR) as the healing response following grafting of autogenous bone block without filling biomaterial at the gap between gap and recipient.Materials and Methods: Twelve Japanese White rabbits were divided into three groups (postoperative 2, 5, and 8 weeks). A cortical block was freed from the mandibular body, half of the block was positioned and fixed overlapped the original bone surface beside the defect and the other half remained only elevated above the defect. Three areas were decided for the evaluation; BG, CBR, and defect (D) area.Areas were evaluated by micro-CT, histology, and histomorphometric analysis.Results: There is no statistical difference between BG and CBR by evaluating distance and area in histomorphometrical analysis (P < .05). D area showed statistical decrease compared with BG and CBR at week 2. Histologically, new bone was evident at week 2, mature bone was observed in all three areas at week 8, D area disappeared and fused completely with the elevated bone block.Conclusion: CBR has potential for bone augmentation as BG induced from its own regenerative ability of healing process. K E Y W O R D Sbone augmentation, bone grafting, bone regeneration, cortical bone repositioning

show abstract

Horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: comparison with a bone-splitting method in a dog model

Cited by 42 publications

References 17 publications

Histological and histomorphometrical comparative study of β-tricalcium phosphate block grafts and periosteal expansion osteogenesis for alveolar bone augmentation

Histological and histomorphometrical comparative study of β-tricalcium phosphate block grafts and periosteal expansion osteogenesis for alveolar bone augmentation

Horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant: long‐term results

Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of the bone regeneration following cortical bone repositioning in a rabbit mandible

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About