1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81416-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot-Electron Transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
118
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cannot be firmly ruled out from the present data, but could be addressed by future experiments on suspended FET devices. Surface roughness scattering might also limit the mobility, and it is not clear from the literature what temperature dependence to expect, although there is some indication it should be weak [26]. From high-resolution TEM we estimate a typical roughness less than 2-3 monolayers for these nanowires.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This cannot be firmly ruled out from the present data, but could be addressed by future experiments on suspended FET devices. Surface roughness scattering might also limit the mobility, and it is not clear from the literature what temperature dependence to expect, although there is some indication it should be weak [26]. From high-resolution TEM we estimate a typical roughness less than 2-3 monolayers for these nanowires.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Rather, this function provides a good model for our data and is based on the the following reasoning. For a fixed number of scatterers, the average mobility increases with temperature as T x , where x ∼ 1, since the carrier concentration increases with temperature leading to an increase in the Fermi velocity, which reduces the scattering probability [38,26]. On the other hand, an increase in the number of scatterers decreases mobility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermoelectric power factor is then derived from the calculated electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient using PF ¼ ra 2 T. Scattering from the ionized impurities and deformation potential of acoustic phonons were considered in the calculations. As it was previously reported, acoustic phonon scattering of charge carriers is the dominant scattering mechanism in SrTiO 3 above 700 K. 22 The momentum relaxation-time for the scattering from ionized impurities is given by Brooks-Herring formula, [23][24][25] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 To study Seebeck coefficient more precisely, in particular to take into account the mobility term, we have followed the scheme proposed in the paper of Madsen and Singh, 49 i.e., we have performed the calculations using Boltzmann transport theory [50][51][52] and constant relaxation time approximation. 53 The latter approximation is based on an assumption that the scattering time determining the electrical conductivity does not vary strongly with energy. The advantage of using constant relaxation time is that the thermoelectric power can be directly calculated from the band structure as a function of carrier concentration and temperature, with no adjustable parameters.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%