2014
DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2014.932160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How (Dis)Satisfied is China? A power transition theory perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The online appendix is available at the publisher's website and at the authors' website, https://dataverse.harvard.edu/ dataverse/caeni 1. For a particular focus on China, see Tammen and Kugler 2006;Lim 2015. For a critique of the power transition theory, see Chan 2007.…”
Section: The Effect On Chinese Exportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online appendix is available at the publisher's website and at the authors' website, https://dataverse.harvard.edu/ dataverse/caeni 1. For a particular focus on China, see Tammen and Kugler 2006;Lim 2015. For a critique of the power transition theory, see Chan 2007.…”
Section: The Effect On Chinese Exportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu noktada güç geçiĢ teorisi temelinde çatıĢma olasılığı, güç denkliği önkoĢuluyla sistemde her zaman var olmaktadır. Dolayısıyla Heng-Lim"in ifadesiyle, Çin, sistemin tatmin olmamıĢ baĢat devletidir (Lim, 2015).…”
Section: Uluslararasi Poli̇ti̇kadaki̇ Güç Geçi̇şleri̇ Ve Asya'nin Yükseli̇şi̇unclassified
“…The rapid rise of China now seems to signal potential attempts to restructure the regional as well as the international order. Although the Chinese authorities take care to use terms such as ‘the peaceful rise of China’ or ‘the peaceful development of China’, many scholars have raised the problem of the ‘China threat’ and considered China as a rising dissatisfied revisionist state (see, for example, Mearsheimer, 2006; Lim, 2015). In June 2013, when Chinese President Xi Jinping had assured US President Barack Obama that the PRC had no intention of challenging the global dominance of the United States, by suggesting the ‘New type of major power relations’ (NTMPR) between the United States and the PRC, many have questioned the true meaning of the NTMPR for the United States.…”
Section: The Rise Of China and South Korea’s Pivotal Middle Power Rolmentioning
confidence: 99%