2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-015-9950-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Pollution? Toward a Better Understanding of the Direct and Conditional Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results are, inter alia , in line with previous findings of Jorgenson (), who determined a positive impact of foreign direct investment on greenhouse gas emissions in primary sector. Additionally, the results support the more general findings of Grimes and Kentor (), Kim and Adilov (), and Zugravu‐Soilita (). However, the results differ from the findings of Pazienza (), who reported negative impact of foreign direct investment on greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Such results are, inter alia , in line with previous findings of Jorgenson (), who determined a positive impact of foreign direct investment on greenhouse gas emissions in primary sector. Additionally, the results support the more general findings of Grimes and Kentor (), Kim and Adilov (), and Zugravu‐Soilita (). However, the results differ from the findings of Pazienza (), who reported negative impact of foreign direct investment on greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Conversely study conducted by Kim and Adilov (2012) [12] which analyze the impact of FDI against CO2 emissions concluded that FDI in developing countries significantly reduce CO2 emissions per capita, because the entire of FDI to developing countries will bring as well as advanced technology and more efficient so that production and waste management will be better. While studies conducted in France, Germany, Sweden, and United Kingdom by Zugravu-soilita (2017) [13] found that the impact of FDI on the environment depends on the environmental regulations that are set by the State, the difference in the level of domestic technology between domestic and foreign companies, and domestic labor productivity. The study also found the more stringent regulations of a country in terms of the environment then the lower levels of pollutants, another else otherwise.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the Porter or the pollution halo hypothesis is of the view that environmental regulations increase the competiveness of the MNCs by compelling them to develop environmentally efficient technologies. And these MNCs, through transferring pro‐environmental technologies, positively influence the environment in the host countries .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%