2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2018.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to achieve the optimal performance of capacitive deionization and inverted-capacitive deionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to choose a suitable cell voltage for the charging and discharging processes, a charge balance process between positive (VO x -C) and negative (Ag-C) electrodes was carried out on the basis of eq : Q + = q + × m + = C + × normalΔ V + × m + = C × normalΔ V × m = q × m = Q where Q + and Q – indicate the total charges stored/delivered in the active materials on the positive and negative electrodes through the discharging process (salt-removing step) within the selected working potential windows (Δ V + and Δ V – ); q is indicative of the specific charge of positive ( q + ) or negative ( q – ) electrodes, and m + and m – are the mass loadings of active material on the positive and negative electrodes, respectively. By taking the VO x -C-NPC//Ag-C-NPC cell as an example, for the discharge process, the lower potential limit of the working potential window on the VO x -C-NPC electrode is selected to be 0 V (vs Ag/AgCl) due to the location of the reduction peak on the GCD curve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to choose a suitable cell voltage for the charging and discharging processes, a charge balance process between positive (VO x -C) and negative (Ag-C) electrodes was carried out on the basis of eq : Q + = q + × m + = C + × normalΔ V + × m + = C × normalΔ V × m = q × m = Q where Q + and Q – indicate the total charges stored/delivered in the active materials on the positive and negative electrodes through the discharging process (salt-removing step) within the selected working potential windows (Δ V + and Δ V – ); q is indicative of the specific charge of positive ( q + ) or negative ( q – ) electrodes, and m + and m – are the mass loadings of active material on the positive and negative electrodes, respectively. By taking the VO x -C-NPC//Ag-C-NPC cell as an example, for the discharge process, the lower potential limit of the working potential window on the VO x -C-NPC electrode is selected to be 0 V (vs Ag/AgCl) due to the location of the reduction peak on the GCD curve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 On the basis of the charge balance work obtained in the 8 mM LiCl solution, an ECDI configuration consisting of the positive electrodes of 5VO x -0C, 5VO x -0.3C, and 0.5VO x -1C and a negative electrode of Ag-C-NPC with the Ω pn values of 2.54, 3.54, and 2.57 were constructed, respectively. 54 For 5VO x -0C//Ag-C (Figure 5a), 5VO x -0.3C//Ag-C (Figure 5b), and 0.5VO x -1C//Ag-C (Figure 5c) cells, a reversible ion adsorption/release behavior was observed operated at relatively low charge/discharge voltages, 0.8 V/−0.2 V. From Figure 5d, the SAC values of the first cycle were 17.2 ± 1.5, 18.6 ± 0.5, and 27.5 ± 1.4 mg/g for 5VO x -0C//Ag-C, 5VO x -0.3C//Ag-C, and 0.5VO x -1C//Ag-C cells, respectively. Note that with the incorporation of Ag-C-NPC as the negative electrode the SAC value of 0.5VO x -1C//Ag-C dramatically increased, demonstrating the superior lithium-ion capturing ability of VO x .…”
Section: Effects Of Carbon On the Positive Electrodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the CDI electrodes are carbon materials (i.e., mainly composed by element carbon), such as activated carbon (Hu et al 2018), carbon aerogel (Zhu et al 2018), ordered mesoporous carbon (Chen et al 2018), activated carbon cloth and nanotubes (Li and Park 2018), graphene family (e.g., graphene sponge (Xu et al 2015) and graphene hydrogel (Ma et al 2018)), and carbon composite (Nie et al 2012), Carbon electrodes are well polarizable and typically with high specific surface area; however, their electrical conductivity strongly depends on the thermal treatment, microtexture, hybridization and content of heteroatoms. As presented in Table S2 (see Supplementary Information), the salt adsorption capacity (SAC) of carbon-based electrodes in conventional CDI varies between 5.0 and 49.3 mg g −1 .…”
Section: Effect Of Electrodes and Configurations On Desalination Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon materials (Huang et al 2017) are commonly used for adsorption materials. The general carbon materials include activated carbon (Kim et al 2016;Hu et al 2018), graphene (Shi et al 2016), activated carbon fiber (Tian et al 2019), carbon aerogel (Quan et al 2017;Liu et al 2019) and carbon nanotubes (Lee et al 2018a(Lee et al , 2018b. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been widely studied and discussed, because of their large specific surface area and good electrical conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%