2005
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1838-05.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Enhance Ipsilateral Actions of Pyramidal Tract Neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monosynaptic excitation of contralateral motor neurons by CINs was shown here directly for the first time, although glutamatergic CINs excited by reticulospinal neurons and projecting directly to contralateral motor neurons have been shown indirectly in adult cats (Bannatyne et al, 2003;Jankowska et al, 2003Jankowska et al, , 2005bHammar et al, 2004;Matsuyama and Jankowska, 2004). Glutamatergic dCINs have also been shown to directly excite caudal, contralateral motor neurons in neonatal rats (Butt and Kiehn, 2003).…”
Section: Excitatory Cinsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Monosynaptic excitation of contralateral motor neurons by CINs was shown here directly for the first time, although glutamatergic CINs excited by reticulospinal neurons and projecting directly to contralateral motor neurons have been shown indirectly in adult cats (Bannatyne et al, 2003;Jankowska et al, 2003Jankowska et al, , 2005bHammar et al, 2004;Matsuyama and Jankowska, 2004). Glutamatergic dCINs have also been shown to directly excite caudal, contralateral motor neurons in neonatal rats (Butt and Kiehn, 2003).…”
Section: Excitatory Cinsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It has been shown that pyramidal tract neurons influence ipsilateral MNs in normal animals through several different types of corticoreticulo-spinal pathways ). Cortico-reticulospinal pathways are suggested to compensate for the transmission of motor commands after damage to corticospinal neurons in adult cats and monkeys Jankowska et al 2005Nishimura et al 2009;Pettersson et al 2007;Riddle et al 2009). In the present study, roughly 50% of recorded ipsilateral MNs responded to stimulation of the left pyramid after the transection of the C 2 dorsal column in hemidecorticated rats (Fig.…”
Section: Possible Descending Cortical Motor Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual site of plastic change for synaptic transmission to ipsilateral MNs after the juvenile brain was lesioned remains to be solved. After the application of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), pyramidal excitation could induce EPSPs in ipsilateral MNs due to the enhancement of synaptic transmission in the cortico-reticulo-spinal pathways (Jankowska et al 2005). It is important to examine whether the strengthened connection in hemidecorticated rats is the same as the connection enhanced by 4-AP.…”
Section: Further Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many plausible explanations for this finding are possible, the simplest explanation would be that direct and indirect reticulospinal pathways were strengthened from the left PMRF to motoneurons on the right side. We know there are reticulospinal neurons with direct contralateral projections to the spinal gray, and there are also strong ipsilateral reticulospinal projections to spinal interneurons that decussate, so these substrates exist (Edgley et al 2004;Jankowska et al 2005;Jankowska and Edgley 2006;Zaaimi et al 2012). The current study was not designed to distinguish between the various possible explanations, which remain as topics for further investigation.…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms For Recovery: Pmrf Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Following damage to corticospinal projections, recovery of arm function could be mediated by strengthening of PMRF effectiveness via corticoreticular pathways from intact ipsilesional cortical motor areas (Jankowska et al 2005;Jankowska and Edgley 2006;Rho et al 1997). Recovery of arm function could also be mediated by increased effectiveness of corticoreticular projections from contralesional homologous cortical motor regions.…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms For Recovery: Pmrf Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%