2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture: A technical and economic evaluation based on computational simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at all of these cases the CO 2 emissions vary from 1538 g/kW h to 3864 g/kW h when the systems are operated in electricity generation mode. These figures are significantly higher than the number of an advanced coal fired electricity power station which has CO 2 emissions of 782 g/kW h [31]. However use of CHP instead of power-only generation the CO 2 emissions decrease to a quite low level (between 421 g/kW h and 562 g/kW h).…”
Section: Case Study Fourmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Looking at all of these cases the CO 2 emissions vary from 1538 g/kW h to 3864 g/kW h when the systems are operated in electricity generation mode. These figures are significantly higher than the number of an advanced coal fired electricity power station which has CO 2 emissions of 782 g/kW h [31]. However use of CHP instead of power-only generation the CO 2 emissions decrease to a quite low level (between 421 g/kW h and 562 g/kW h).…”
Section: Case Study Fourmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Based on mass balance in WFGD chemical reaction [25,31], limestone consumption W lim is given by Equations (4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Co 2 Emissions By So 2 Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through testing an 800 MW e supercritical power plant with specific coal content, Huang et al . suggest that emission intensity is 782.88 gCO 2 /KWh. Obiorien et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is expected that this alternative minimizes investment and operating costs and increases energy efficiency of CO 2 capture in fossil-fuels power plants [10]. Reboiler duty can be reduced up to 30% in partial oxy-combustion operations in comparison with post-combustion capture based on chemical absorption using MEA [6].Several authors have shown that partial oxycombustion is a technically and economically feasible technology that can provide significantly reductions of both electricity price and CO 2 capture cost [6,11]. Partial oxy-combustion offers some potential advantages for CCS technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%