2016
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3248-15.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De NovoEmergence of Odor Category Representations in the Human Brain

Abstract: Categorization allows organisms to efficiently extract relevant information from a diverse environment. Because of the multidimensional nature of odor space, this ability is particularly important for the olfactory system. However, categorization relies on experience, and the processes by which the human brain forms categorical representations about new odor percepts are currently unclear. Here we used olfactory psychophysics and multivariate fMRI techniques, in the context of a paired-associates learning task… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This points to the fact that aversive learning jointly influenced exploration patterns at both ends of the stimulus continuum. This is compatible with the view that following an aversive learning, the nervous system achieves a categorization process along the smoothly changing perceptual continuum [37,39,41,50]. Our results show that this categorization process results also in detectable changes at the behavioral level.…”
Section: Cc-by 40 International License Not Peer-reviewed) Is the Ausupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This points to the fact that aversive learning jointly influenced exploration patterns at both ends of the stimulus continuum. This is compatible with the view that following an aversive learning, the nervous system achieves a categorization process along the smoothly changing perceptual continuum [37,39,41,50]. Our results show that this categorization process results also in detectable changes at the behavioral level.…”
Section: Cc-by 40 International License Not Peer-reviewed) Is the Ausupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The increased arousal hypothesis therefore predicts an equal but stronger contribution of the underlying specific and unspecific components (Fig 1C, middle panel), leading to a better separation of all exploration patterns globally in comparison to pre-learning period. Third, eye-movements may reflect a categorization process for faces as aversive vs. safe [37][38][39][40][41]. To achieve this, exploration strategies can be tailored to collect relevant information to predict adversity and safety.…”
Section: Hypotheses On Learning-induced Changes In the Similarity Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another brain structure playing a crucial role in memory of disgust was PRC. Other findings support complex multi-modal item representations in this region 54,55 , such as integration of novel odors with visual category information 56 , or integration of visual with conceptual object features 57 . PRC was also shown to reflect semantic similarity between words 58 , yet here we found no difference in the semantic coherence of word pairs between disgust and fear.…”
Section: Differences In Memory Modulation By Disgust and Fearmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Para que um odor possa ser decodificado em nível cerebral é necessário que o composto seja: volátil o suficiente para adentrar na região sensorial, parcialmente solúvel para que recubra a mucosa nasal, envolva os receptores nervosos e se mantenha em contato com as moléculas odoríferas por um tempo e quantidade mínimos (QU et al, 2016;ROLAND et al, 2017). Pode-se supor que, muito provavelmente, tais aspectos não tenham sido contemplados em sua totalidade neste experimento, considerando os baixos escores atribuídos aos diferentes grupos testados.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A adoção neste trabalho de julgadores exclusivamente do sexo feminino, levou em consideração sua maior acuidade olfativa e também por possuírem de 40% a 50% mais células no bulbo olfatório, região responsável por elaborar as impressões de odor recebidas pelo cérebro (OLIVEIRA-PINTO, 2014); e, no tocante à faixa etária, as julgadoras possuíam idade inferior a 50 anos, pois após os 50 anos o indivíduo pode apresentar certo grau de dessensibilização devido à degeneração das células do epitélio olfatório (NETO et al, 2011). Contudo, acredita-se que essas padronizações não tenham sido suficientes para mitigar possíveis entraves decorrentes dos aspectos ressaltados por Qu et al (2016) e Roland et al (2017, em especial, a concentração mínima dos compostos voláteis.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified