Objectives: The Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) conducts an annual search of peerreviewed and gray literature relevant to global emergency medicine (EM) to identify, review, and disseminate the most important new research in this field to a global audience of academics and clinical practitioners.Methods: This year, 17,722 articles written in three languages were identified by our electronic search. These articles were distributed among 20 reviewers for initial screening based on their relevance to the field of global EM. Another two reviewers searched the gray literature, yielding an additional 11 articles. All articles that were deemed appropriate by at least one reviewer and approved by their editor underwent formal scoring of overall quality and importance. Two independent reviewers scored all articles.Results: A total of 848 articles met our inclusion criteria and underwent full review. Sixty-three percent were categorized as emergency care in resource-limited settings, 23% as disaster and humanitarian response, and 14% as EM development. Twenty-one articles received scores of 18.5 or higher out of a maximum score 20 and were selected for formal summary and critique. Inter-rater reliability testing between reviewers revealed a Cohen's kappa of 0.344.
Conclusions:In 2017, the total number of articles identified by our search continued to increase. Studies and reviews with a focus on infectious diseases, pediatrics, and trauma represented the majority of top-scoring articles.T he Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) strives to improve the global practice of emergency medicine (EM) by facilitating emergency care practitioners' identification of the most current and important research conducted on relevant topics around the world. Our review began in 2005 in an attempt to identify and consolidate the relevant global EM literature into a format that is readily available to academics and clinicians. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] This year, our panel of reviewers and editors included physicians from Australia, Canada, Ethiopia, Ghana, Laos, Rwanda, and the United States.Our group strives to identify the most relevant practice-changing articles, by scouring both the peerreviewed and the gray literature via a comprehensive search strategy. Gray literature has been defined as any material produced by an organization whose primary function is not peer-reviewed academic publication.
13Our goal in performing a gray literature search is to identify new global EM research conducted by government agencies, local or international nongovernmental organizations, or other entities that may not have been published in peer-reviewed journals.The primary goals of the review are to illustrate best practices, stimulate research, and promote further professionalization in the field of global EM through the identification of important new publications that focus on emergency care in the global context, especially emergency care provision in limited-resource settings, disaster and hum...