Proceedings of 9th International Conference on VLSI Design
DOI: 10.1109/icvd.1996.489643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying redundant path delay faults in sequential circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, such false paths can be unintentionally created during the design flow, and it is important to find and exclude them from the circuit because they can make a negative impact on some aspects of circuit design. Several methods have been proposed to identify false paths in a combinational circuit or a sequential circuit at gate level (GL) [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. At register transfer level (RTL) or higher level, on the other hand, false paths can be also identified by analyzing high-level design information (e.g., structural information, data flow, control flow, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, such false paths can be unintentionally created during the design flow, and it is important to find and exclude them from the circuit because they can make a negative impact on some aspects of circuit design. Several methods have been proposed to identify false paths in a combinational circuit or a sequential circuit at gate level (GL) [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. At register transfer level (RTL) or higher level, on the other hand, false paths can be also identified by analyzing high-level design information (e.g., structural information, data flow, control flow, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several false path identification methods at the gate level for combinational circuits [1]- [3] and for sequential circuits [4], [5] have been proposed. However, since it is difficult to apply false path identification methods at the gate level for large circuits containing a tremendous number of paths, some methods using register transfer level (RTL) design information, instead of gate level, have been proposed [6]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if scan dwign is used, the ofly fatits that can affect circuit behavior me those that are sensitized during normrd (nonscan) operation. We identification of redundant and untestable fadts [20,21] can be used to rduce test generation effort, the remaining set wodd stiUcontain fatits that need not be testd.~us, primitive fadts must be identified assuming non-scan operation to avoid unnecessary tests and pessimistic twt restits. me god of this paper is to develop methods of identifying primitive fardts in non-scan squentid tircuits, and deriving robust tests for robusfly testable primitive fadts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%