2018
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image features and DUS testing traits for peanut pod variety identification and pedigree analysis

Abstract: BACKGROUND: DUS (Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability) testing of new varieties is an important method for peanut germplasm evaluation and identification of varieties. In order to verify the feasibility of variety identification for peanut DUS testing based on image processing, 2000 peanut pod images from 20 varieties were obtained by a scanner. Initially, six DUS testing traits were quantified using a mathematical method based on image processing technology, and then, size, shape, color and texture features… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that DUS testing is based on the apparent morphological characteristics of the study plants, the results and comparative analysis of candidate, standard, and approximate varieties will be influenced by environmental factors [8]. In addition, different testers may subjectively perceive traits differently, leading to inconsistencies in the evaluation of certain traits [9]. Moreover, the substantial workload involved further increases the likelihood of human error in DUS testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that DUS testing is based on the apparent morphological characteristics of the study plants, the results and comparative analysis of candidate, standard, and approximate varieties will be influenced by environmental factors [8]. In addition, different testers may subjectively perceive traits differently, leading to inconsistencies in the evaluation of certain traits [9]. Moreover, the substantial workload involved further increases the likelihood of human error in DUS testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K‐means clustering showed presence of distinct phenotypic groups of genotypes in this panel. The robustness of this approach in genotype clustering was previously demonstrated in maize (Ma, Cheng, & Zhang, 2014), soybean (Leite, Unêda‐Trevisoli, da Silva, da Silva, & Di Mauro, 2018) and peanut (Deng & Han, 2019). The decision on selection of which covariates should be added to DUS‐traits enhanced genomic prediction was supported by the results of stepwise selection in which all combinations of traits were used to predict the response traits grain yield and plant height (Burnham & Anderson, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the early years, manual observation with a microscope was used to detect rice blast . Later came the hyperspectral detection method and the morphological image detection method . Nevertheless, these methods detect lesions on the surface of rice, and these are easy to confuse with other diseases, and so the accuracy may not be high enough.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%