2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagery of motor actions: Differential effects of kinesthetic and visual–motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
426
3
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 620 publications
(472 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
16
426
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the correlation between the BCI classifier and the KI score was lower for the GOI task than for the SI task. A possible explanation might be that very 'good' imagers already had good kinaesthetic imagination and the presence of an object diverted them from kinaesthetic to a visual imagery, which activated different areas of the cortex [Neuper et al 2005, Guillot et al 2009]. This hypothesis was supported by the results of the analysis of the ERS/ERD maps of participants with the worst and best KI during SI and GOI.…”
Section: Disucssion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the correlation between the BCI classifier and the KI score was lower for the GOI task than for the SI task. A possible explanation might be that very 'good' imagers already had good kinaesthetic imagination and the presence of an object diverted them from kinaesthetic to a visual imagery, which activated different areas of the cortex [Neuper et al 2005, Guillot et al 2009]. This hypothesis was supported by the results of the analysis of the ERS/ERD maps of participants with the worst and best KI during SI and GOI.…”
Section: Disucssion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A true positive rate (a ratio of correctly classified trials compared to total number of trials) was adopted as a measure of the classification accuracy. A mean value of true positive rate for the right and the left hand was presented Signal processing was performed using rtsBCI [Scherer 2005] and the BioSig Open source toolboxes in Matlab (Mathworks Inc, USA).…”
Section: The Experimental Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported that one reason that SSVEP performance improved with practice was development of new attentional strategies. Similarly, subjects who utilized first-person movement imagery learned mu BCI control better than subjects who were told to adopt third-person movement imagery (Neuper et al, 2005).…”
Section: 2: Inter-subject Differences and Implications For Bcismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…People can voluntarily modulate SSVEP activity without shifting gaze using a display and task that could be adapted to a BCI. Many avenues toward improvement that have been successful with other BCIs, such as improved referencing, filtering, subject and classifier training, task and display optimization, noise rejection, incorporation of additional signal features, spectral analysis parameters, and other parameters have not yet been fully explored (McFarland et al, 1997(McFarland et al, , 1998(McFarland et al, , 2005(McFarland et al, , 2006Wolpaw et al, 2002;Allison, 2003;Birbaumer et al, 2003;Kübler and Neumann, 2005;Neuper et al, 2005;Allison and Pineda, 2006). Initial efforts have suggested that some of these avenues may be useful in SSVEP BCI systems (Wang et al, 2004;Kelly et al, 2005aKelly et al, , 2005bLalor et al, 2005;Müller-Putz et al, 2005;Trejo et al, 2006).…”
Section: 4: Future Directions With Ssvep Bcismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were instructed to imagine feeling muscles in their legs (kinaesthetic imagery) rather than a simple visual imagery because of their distinctive activation of the sensory-motor cortex (Neuper et al 2005). After each cue, 5s were given to participants to concentrate on the tasks prior to SMR measurement.…”
Section: Motor Imagery Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%