2016
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.858.607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Al Doping Concentration at Channel Region on Mobility and Threshold Voltage Instability in 4H-SiC Trench N-MOSFETs

Abstract: The effect of Al doping concentration (NA) at channel regions ranging from 1.0×1017 to 4.0×1017 cm-3 on the effective channel mobility of electron (μeff) and the threshold voltage (Vth) instability under the positive bias-temperature-stress conditions has been investigated througu the use of trench-gate 4H-SiC MOSFETs with m-face (1-100) channel regions. It was found that μeff degraded with an increase in NA. On the other hand, the increase of NA enlarged the Vth instability. These results indicate that NA has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OP If m C increases due to the suppression of interface traps at the SiO 2 /SiC interface and near-interface traps in the SiO 2 layer, m SR is expected to be the limiting factor. 24) Compared with the result obtained using DOWN measurements without R S , the m eff calculated from UP measurements is up to 21% lower. Moreover, as can be seen, there is a large difference in the surface roughness scattering mobility values obtained using the two measurement methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…OP If m C increases due to the suppression of interface traps at the SiO 2 /SiC interface and near-interface traps in the SiO 2 layer, m SR is expected to be the limiting factor. 24) Compared with the result obtained using DOWN measurements without R S , the m eff calculated from UP measurements is up to 21% lower. Moreover, as can be seen, there is a large difference in the surface roughness scattering mobility values obtained using the two measurement methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…( 8), V th was determined based on the ideal V th and ideal I D -V G characteristics. 23,24) The Hall effect measurement and the split capacitancevoltage measurement enable the quantitative characterization of the densities of free and trapped carriers at SiO2/SiC interfaces. 25) However, in the calculation of the Hall mobility, the Hall factor is uncertain due to the large interface state density.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…μ eff was directly evaluated from the I D -V G characteristics measured at each temperature, by the following twostep process. [19][20][21] The first step was the definition of V th . By means of the ideal V th and ideal I D -V G characteristics in the subthreshold region, 21) the inversion current where the surface potential is equal to 2ψ B was obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface state density (D it ), V th and μ eff were calculated directly from the measured I D -V G charactesistics. 25,26) D it was calculated from the subthreshold swing of the measured I D -V G curves. The calculated D it locates at the energy level in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 eV from the conduction band edge of SiC.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%