2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implication of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) F transgene sequence heterogeneity observed in Phase 1 evaluation of MEDI-534, a live attenuated parainfluenza type 3 vectored RSV vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…were reminiscent of ones described previously in the rB/ HPIV3-F2 virus from the nasal washes of vaccinated children (20). The other three mutant clones had mutations in the N and/or L protein whose effects are unknown.…”
Section: ⌬170mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…were reminiscent of ones described previously in the rB/ HPIV3-F2 virus from the nasal washes of vaccinated children (20). The other three mutant clones had mutations in the N and/or L protein whose effects are unknown.…”
Section: ⌬170mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Previous clinical evaluation of the rB/HPIV3-F2 construct showed that the stability of RSV F expression is an important consideration (20). In that study, ϳ2.5% of the virus in the clinical trial material used for human administration did not express RSV F, and approximately half of the nasal wash specimens from vaccine recipients contained virus with mutations expected to reduce or ablate expression of the RSV F insert (20).…”
Section: ⌬170mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If this attenuation was due, at least in part, to expression of the GP insert, then mutations that silence expression of GP could provide a selective advantage. This is reminiscent of observations with a PIV vector expressing the RSV F protein, which also acquired mutations that would silence expression of the foreign gene (26). However, if silencing the expression of EBOV GP did provide a selective advantage, that advantage may not be very great, because there was not a progressive increase with time in the loss of GP expression during AGM infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%