1981
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(81)90247-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of secondary enzyme-substrate interactions in human cathepsin G and chymotrypsin II catalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Residues near to the protease cleavage sites were reported to largely change the hydrolysis kinetics of a protease, which was termed a ‘secondary enzyme–substrate interaction’ . This phenomenon was reported for a variety of proteases, including pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase . Analogously, in this study, crosslinked and non‐crosslinked glycation structures near to a potential cleavage site may also change the action preference and hydrolysis kinetics of pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase, resulting in discrepancies in the digested peptides.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Residues near to the protease cleavage sites were reported to largely change the hydrolysis kinetics of a protease, which was termed a ‘secondary enzyme–substrate interaction’ . This phenomenon was reported for a variety of proteases, including pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase . Analogously, in this study, crosslinked and non‐crosslinked glycation structures near to a potential cleavage site may also change the action preference and hydrolysis kinetics of pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase, resulting in discrepancies in the digested peptides.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…35 This phenomenon was reported for a variety of proteases, including pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase. 36,37 Analogously, in this study, crosslinked and non-crosslinked glycation structures near to a potential cleavage site may also change the action preference and hydrolysis kinetics of pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase, resulting in discrepancies in the digested peptides. These changes should largely change the nutritional value of the relevant proteins.…”
Section: Peptide Analysis Of Digests By Lc-esi-ms/msmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Previously,it was reported that Suc-Tyr-Leu-Phe-pNA(3)was a good substrate for achymotrypsin and its stereoisomer,Suc-Tyr-D-Leu-D-Phe-pNA(7),inhibited the enzyme .In the latter case,the pNA moiety of the peptide significantly participated in binding of the peptide with a-chymotrypsin,resulting in the manifestation of the inhibitory activity.8)Thus, kinetic parameters for the amidolysis of Suc-Tyr-Leu-Phe-pNA(3)and newly synthesized Suc-Ala-Leu-Phe-pNA(5)by cathepsin G were determined and the results are summarized in Table I in comparison with those of a-chymotrypsin.As can be seen in the table,k cat/Km values with cathepsin G are much smaller than those with a-chymotrypsin.This tendency is compatible with data reported previously: 7,9) The hydrolysis of Suc-Phe-pNA(1)and Suc-Leu-Phe-pNA(2)by both enzymes was negligible.For hydrolysis of the Phe-pNA bond,a three amino acids sequence was required. The extension of the tripeptide substrates (3,5)at the N-terminus,Suc-Ala-Tyr-Leu-Phe-pNA (4)and Suc-Ala-Ala-Leu-Phe-pNA(6),resulted in markedly decreased hydrolysis rates of the Phe-pNA bond by both enzymes.Tripeptide substrates are the most favorable for both enzymes when the Leu-Phe-pNA moiety was employed because the kcat/Km values of SucVal-Pro-Phe-pNA and Suc-X-Val-Pro-Phe-pNA(X:Met,Leu,Phe,Ala,Lys and Glu) were similar.10)…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…The role of substrate conformation was also exemplified by the study of Graf and Hollosi (88) on the conversion by tsypsin of P-lipotropin to P-endorphin which was found to be more specific because of a secondary structure promoting medium. Finally, it has been shown that interactions with part of the substrate remote from the cleavage point are important in promoting proteolysis; this observation, which was first made by Schechter and Berger (89), seems to be true for many and various proteases as presented by Boudier et al (90) conformation (95). The studies of Fletcher et al (36) on proinsulin and proglucagon converting activities in secretory granules seem to confirm the importance of protein sequences around the maturation site.…”
Section: Prepro-calc! Tonlnmentioning
confidence: 77%